Webware for Python

I've finished a simple tutorial on how to use WSGIKit to build a simple 
to-do application.  You can find it at:

   http://wsgikit.org/docs/TodoTutorial.html

The download and loading of dependencies is still bugging me, but once 
you've done that I think the tutorial shows that WSGIKit apps are pretty 
easy to get started with, just a few simple commands.

-- 
Ian Bicking  /  ianb@...  / http://blog.ianbicking.org

Re: [Webware-discuss] WSGIKit to-do tutorial From: Scott Russell <scott@to...> - 2005-04-09 10:59 On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 03:33 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > I've finished a simple tutorial on how to use WSGIKit to build a simple > to-do application. You can find it at: Ian, Thanks for that - if you have any spare time, could you also do a version of a similar tutorial, but showing how you would use WSGIKit, SQLObject and FormEncode to build CRUD pages? (Or maybe explain why you wouldn't do this.) I'm just about to begin a project like this myself, but would appreciate a rough (working) map on the way in. - Scott

Re: [Webware-discuss] WSGIKit to-do tutorial From: Olivier FAVRE-SIMON <olivier.favre-simon@cl...> - 2005-04-09 12:00 Attachments: signature.asc      Many thanks for this tutorial. (and by the way for using same CSS as SQLObject; may all your great work gather into a complete framework, that will be a much easier task to host everything in a common site.) I've been interested in WSGIKit for some time now but had not enough time to gather all infos and try an "hello world" app. Even if I'm fully satisfied with Cheetah that's also an opportunity to look at ZPT. My question : What kind of operations is/will be possible with WSGIKit that wouldn't be with WebKit ? Ian Bicking wrote: > I've finished a simple tutorial on how to use WSGIKit to build a > simple to-do application. You can find it at: > > http://wsgikit.org/docs/TodoTutorial.html > > The download and loading of dependencies is still bugging me, but once > you've done that I think the tutorial shows that WSGIKit apps are > pretty easy to get started with, just a few simple commands. >

Re: [Webware-discuss] WSGIKit to-do tutorial From: Ian Bicking <ianb@co...> - 2005-04-09 19:31 Scott Russell wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 03:33 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > >>I've finished a simple tutorial on how to use WSGIKit to build a simple >>to-do application. You can find it at: > > > Ian, > Thanks for that - if you have any spare time, could you also do a > version of a similar tutorial, but showing how you would use WSGIKit, > SQLObject and FormEncode to build CRUD pages? (Or maybe explain why you > wouldn't do this.) I'm just about to begin a project like this myself, > but would appreciate a rough (working) map on the way in. I've been thinking about extending the tutorial with various different features -- like multi-user, which introduces modifying the database schema and some path parsing (like the app in examples/todo right now), and user authentication, which could perhaps include a registration form (which can be complicated enough to justify FormEncode). But I don't know... writing docs can be a lot of work ;) -- Ian Bicking / ianb@... / http://blog.ianbicking.org

Re: [Webware-discuss] WSGIKit to-do tutorial From: Ian Bicking <ianb@co...> - 2005-04-09 19:56 Olivier FAVRE-SIMON wrote: > Many thanks for this tutorial. > > (and by the way for using same CSS as SQLObject; may all your great work > gather into a complete framework, that will be a much easier task to > host everything in a common site.) > > I've been interested in WSGIKit for some time now but had not enough > time to gather all infos and try an "hello world" app. > > Even if I'm fully satisfied with Cheetah that's also an opportunity to > look at ZPT. I actually think Cheetah would be more appealing to a lot of people, but I haven't had a chance to review its state of integration. If anyone wants to translate the tutorial to Cheetah that would be great. > My question : What kind of operations is/will be possible with WSGIKit > that wouldn't be with WebKit ? * Well, there's more deployments that are possible -- CGI is better supported, multi-process or running in mod_python. But I haven't actually excersized this much. * Configuration is a little more concise. * The URL parsing is somewhat more flexible, and different kinds of parsing could be plugged in. URL discovery should be easier too. Hmm... not a whole lot that's "new", mostly just "easier". I've actually avoided the new stuff -- it would be easy to get distracted recreating Webware with a whole new API and featureset. All I'm trying to do right now is deal with the low level deployment stuff. Component (http://wiki.w4py.org/component.html) actually does give some new features, but that's usable with WSGIKit or Webware. -- Ian Bicking / ianb@... / http://blog.ianbicking.org

1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.