Webware for Python

Matt Feifarek wrote:
> Hi Chas.
> 
> Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
> say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
> know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
> not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
> 
> I'm glad that you're giving it a try. I think that you'll find it a
> pleasure to work with.

I think Webware needs an automated test suite and better documentation in
order to be considered 1.0.  The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to
have the time or inclination to do it.

- Geoff

Re: [Webware-discuss] Activity and Progress From: lloyd <subscr002@tw...> - 2004-10-28 19:30 Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > The time is way overdue for a new release from > the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps > forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to > have the time or inclination to do it. what is required? ps - is the traffic on this list low enough to consider making the list address the default reply-to ?

Re: [Webware-discuss] Activity and Progress From: Mark Phillips <mark@mo...> - 2004-11-02 16:51 On Oct 28, 2004, at 12:31 PM, lloyd wrote: > Geoffrey Talvola wrote: >> The time is way overdue for a new release from >> the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps >> forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently >> seems to >> have the time or inclination to do it. > > what is required? > > ps - is the traffic on this list low enough to consider making the > list address the default reply-to ? Perhaps I don't understand how this type of project is managed. I was waiting for one of the sourceforge project owners to bless someone with the task. Is that the protocol? My offer to work with someone to get a new release built still stands, if needed. Mark Phillips

RE: [Webware-discuss] Activity and Progress From: Geoffrey Talvola <gtalvola@na...> - 2004-11-02 18:00 >> Geoffrey Talvola wrote: >>> The time is way overdue for a new release from >>> the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer >>> steps forward because none of the developers (myself included) >>> currently seems to have the time or inclination to do it. >> >> what is required? >> >> ps - is the traffic on this list low enough to consider making the >> list address the default reply-to ? > > Perhaps I don't understand how this type of project is managed. I was > waiting for one of the sourceforge project owners to bless someone > with the task. Is that the protocol? > > My offer to work with someone to get a new release built still stands, > if needed. > Thanks for volunteering. I don't have a lot of time to help out right now, but I can point you toward this "Release Procedures" document, which is in CVS: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/webware/Webware/Docs/Releas eProcedures.html?rev=1.9 And if you provide me with your sourceforge account name, I can give you the necessary permissions. Release discussions traditionally take place on webware-devel instead of webware-discuss, so I recommend moving any further discussion there. - Geoff

1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.