Webware for Python

I have the following note in the current installation guide:

	mod_python itself is still somewhat immature and the adapter is new, so 
this approach should be considered somewhat experimental right now.


I believe that's still true, especially the first part. But I wanted to run 
this by you and get your thoughts, since you've had the most experience 
with this adapter.

(BTW I'm cranking out the fleshed out version of the WebKit Install Guide.)

-Chuck

Re: [Webware-discuss] mod_python adapter question From: Chuck Esterbrook <echuck@mi...> - 2000-09-25 14:26 Er, I guess this is addressed to "Jay". That's what I mean when I say "you". :-) -Chuck At 10:23 AM 9/25/00 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: >I have the following note in the current installation guide: > > mod_python itself is still somewhat immature and the adapter is > new, so this approach should be considered somewhat experimental right now. > > >I believe that's still true, especially the first part. But I wanted to >run this by you and get your thoughts, since you've had the most >experience with this adapter. > >(BTW I'm cranking out the fleshed out version of the WebKit Install Guide.) > >-Chuck > >_______________________________________________ >Webware-discuss mailing list >Webware-discuss@... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss

Re: [Webware-discuss] mod_python adapter question From: Jay Love <jslove@mi...> - 2000-09-25 21:59 It's true, but I wouldn't phrase it quite so strongly. I've been using it for more than a month now with no problems. Maybe you should just say that's it's the least tested. I wouldn't call it experimental. I'll write the install instructions for this if you'll leave me a hole. Jay Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > I have the following note in the current installation guide: > > mod_python itself is still somewhat immature and the adapter is new, so > this approach should be considered somewhat experimental right now. > > I believe that's still true, especially the first part. But I wanted to run > this by you and get your thoughts, since you've had the most experience > with this adapter. > > (BTW I'm cranking out the fleshed out version of the WebKit Install Guide.) > > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > Webware-discuss mailing list > Webware-discuss@... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss

Re: [Webware-discuss] mod_python adapter question From: Chuck Esterbrook <echuck@mi...> - 2000-09-25 22:04 At 06:04 PM 9/25/00 -0400, Jay Love wrote: >It's true, but I wouldn't phrase it quite so strongly. I've been using it for >more than a month now with no problems. Maybe you should just say that's >it's the >least tested. I wouldn't call it experimental. I'll write the install >instructions for this if you'll leave me a hole. I'll tweak the statement. Wait until my next update before writing the instructions. I have a fat 25K install guide coming real soon... -Chuck

1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.