> I went to fix a bug in c.bnf, and realized I should use c.by. This
> is targeting c.el as the output file. Is semantic-c.el obsolete=3F I'=
> like to use the improved grammar but am a little confused as to your
> intention. Is `semantic-bnf' now obsolete pending me converting the
> .bnf files to .by=3F
c.by targets a dummy c.el file to let you experiment with the new
grammar framework ;-)
semantic-c.el is not obsolete at all. If you change c.el with
semantic-c.el in c.by, it should work, but it is untested yet ;-)
However, it is still possible to use the old semantic-bnf framework
to update semantic-c.el. As BNF grammars are not yet all converted
to BY format, semantic-bnf is still required.
Hope it helps!
P.S.: I am currently very busy both at work (a new big e-Business
project!) and at home, so I can't work on Semantic as I would like to
do :-( Sorry!