> When are you going to get started on this?=20
I know about the branch. Perhaps it is best if I hand merge it, so I =
know where things are, how it works, etc.
If you can just give me some pointers or files to check I think I'll be =
able to figure it out.
Regarding tablet + LPE, I cannot make promises. I agree this would make =
a powerful parameter to use for lpe's but I will focus on getting them =
there first. I hope to come up with a parameter system that is flexible =
enough to easily handle different parameter types (such as tilt).=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Gould [mailto:ted@...
> Sent: dinsdag 17 april 2007 17:22
> To: Engelen, J.B.C. (Johan)
> Cc: Aaron Spike; inkscape-devel
> Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] LPE diff
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:15 +0200, Johan Engelen wrote:
> > >From what I gather from the discussion, no consensus was=20
> reached on=20
> > >the
> > SVG representation. Perhaps it is best, like Bulia said, to=20
> first make=20
> > it working the 'ugly' simple way,
> > <path
> > original-d=3D ...
> > d =3D ...
> > path-effect=3D"sample"
> > path-effect-param1=3D"0.0"
> > path-effect-param2=3D"0.0"
> > path-effect-param3=3D"0.0"
> > path-effect-param4=3D"0.0" />
> When are you going to get started on this? (basically when is school
> over) I seriously have most of the code done for getting=20
> this working "right", but unfortunately it's on a branch that=20
> is severely out of date with the codebase (distributed SCM is=20
> fun!) -- I think I'm going to have to hand merge it. But, I=20
> do have a 9 hour flight for LGM coming up, and two=20
> batteries... so I could probably get it done by the end of=20
> LGM -- would that impede your progress?
> Also, I would like as part of this if we could introduce=20
> attributes (in the inkscape namespace) for the pressure and=20
> tilt of the pen. I think this would be something very=20
> powerful for the path effects to use, and is currently data=20
> we're throwing away.