1.1 isn't frozen at all yet. Feel free to put in what you want. Once we
get tired of adding new features and such, we'll name it 1.2.0 and call it
stable. Then release maintenance releases 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, and those
are when it's frozen. That won't be for a while yet. I released 1.1.0 last
week because Tyler had a bunch of code in there he wanted to have people
start testing. Feel free to add whatever is necessary.
> I see that 1.1.0 was released last sunday, but I'm missing some info
> about it on the devel list.
> First, there are a lot of different tags in CVS now. For the
> 1.0-branch (named sm-1_0) we have been good at following the
> guidelines for naming. But with the release of 1.1, no branch was
> created (correct, since the next branch would be sm-1_2 -- we don't
> need two development branches) but it was tagged "brch-1_1". IMHO, the
> correct name would be rel-1_1 or
> rel-1_1_0. Another tag, "sm-1_1_1" also appeared. According to the
> naming guidelines this would be a branch, but it appears to be a tag
> created for a non-exitsting version "1.1.1" (not released AFAIK).
> Maybe we should rename these tags?
> Second, I was wondering how "frozen" the 1.1 is now since I can't
> remember seeing anything about that here? I'd like to add a new
> configuration option to config.php that would make it easier to
> configure the database addressbook. Maybe do some changes in how
> preferences are loaded too to make it easier to switch to the db-prefs.
> I think there is a demand for these database backends, so I feel like
> making them a bit easier to configure.
>  http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/NamingGuidelinesForCVS
> Pål Løberg Initio IT-løsninger AS
> pallo@... http://www.initio.no/
. . Luke Ehresman - "Codito, ergo sum"
/ v \ luke@...
/( )\ http://www.css.tayloru.edu/~lehresma