Ok, a made a svn diff on my current working directory, I then clean this
up by hand a bit.
I removed some other stuff that is unrelated.
You can find my latest atempt att sending in a patch that adds the
missing imu player interface files here:
This patch is against a very recent trunk revsion so you will have to
make some modifications. I previously tried to commit this path and
those files should still be in the tracker if you want to look for them.
That version may be more likely to work with gazebo 0.9. But I think the
only difference is that some file changed name, gazebo.h to gz.h, and
maybe some function names were changes.
After taking a look at, or applying that patch you can check the svn
diff file that will hopefully be attached to this email.
Do not try to apply this as a patch, as I have made some manual cleanup.
Also some contents may overlap with the IMU patch.
In the diff file you can find my additional (more or less ugly) changes
that I made to get velocity derivative in the accelerometer output.
If you find something in there that looks suspicious, please let me
know. I have not really made sure that it actually works as it is
suposed to, (it seems to however).
On 03/30/2011 04:42 PM, Neostek wrote:
> Hi Peter and John,
> I'm facing the same problem with getting acceleration from gazebo and i'm
> using a flying robot.
> Do you think it could be possible to have your code (i mean the imu
> interface and the gazebo files you modified)? I need to solve this problem
> and a "starting point" would be of great help!
> (Obviously i'll share with you my solution when i'll come to one :)
> Thanks in advance.
> @John: Thanks a lot for opening thread. It could be very useful!
> John Hsu-2 wrote:
>> I've opened a ticket for this issue
>> Please feel free to update the ticket.
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Peter Nordin<peter.nordin@...> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately I do not think that I can help you, but I am having a
>>> similar problem.
>>> I am have been trying to use the IMU sensor, (I have added a few missing
>>> player interface related files), but in my case the acceleration is
>>> allways zero. Anyway I was not able to figure out why so I made some
>>> minor additions to the gazebo code and differentiated the linear
>>> velocity between each timestep. This way the reported acceleration will
>>> be the actual velocity derivative. The problem is that I wont get
>>> g=-9.81 in my output. This is OK in my ground robot case as I usually
>>> just remove the gravity component anyway. For flying robots I do not not
>>> know if this is Ok.
>>> I tried adding an additional "artificial" gravity vector (rotated into
>>> the curent body coordinate system) but realised that when the robot was
>>> moving along the Z-axis (very rarely), I would get double acceleration.
>>> -9.81 as well as the actual velocity derivative (-9.81 when free
>>> falling). I the end I removed the artificial gravity vector, as I actual
>>> have no real use for it.
>>> It is probably possible to solve this in some smart way but I have not
>>> had time to try and figure one out.
>>> I am using a fairly recent Gazebo svn version and player 3.0.2
>>> On 03/28/2011 05:26 PM, Neostek wrote:
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> i'm using Gazebo to simulate a PD controller on a quadrotor UAV.
>>>> The control evalueates the force and torque to apply to the quadrotor
>>>> then i use the methods
>>>> dBodyAddRelForce(body_id, 0, 0, thrust) and dBodyAddRelTorque(body_id,
>>>> roll_torque, pitch_torque, 0).
>>>> Now i would like to get information about position, velocity and
>>>> acceleration of the quadrotor.
>>>> To do so, i use the methods:
>>>> and the last one appears to give practically nonsense results (gravity
>>>> acceleration depending on the mass for instance...).
>>>> Browsing into the code i found out that GetLinearAccel() simply does
>>>> return this->GetForce() / this->GetMass();
>>>> That is " F = m*a " as it should be.
>>>> Anyway the controller works and the quadrotor get still on the target
>>>> but the acceleration i get on the z axis is positive (e.g. = 19.6) even
>>>> though the quadrotor is not varying its height.
>>>> I really have no point...please help me! :)
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>> For the sake of completeness i'm using the following software version:
>>>> Gazebo - 0.9.0
>>>> Player - 2.1.3
>>> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet
>>> growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
>>> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your
>>> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
>>> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
>>> Playerstage-gazebo mailing list
>> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
>> growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
>> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
>> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
>> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
>> Playerstage-gazebo mailing list