The current schema can be found at:
> -----Original Message-----
al.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Lieberman
> Sent: 05 September, 2007 1:10 PM
> To: context.rwg@...
> Cc: mapbuilder-devel@...
> Subject: Re: [Context.RWG] layer id in OWS Context
> What, by the way, is the current schema and where can it be found?
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:
> >> Tom,
> >> I know we have discussed putting an id inside a <Layer> in an OWS=20
> >> Context document before and to date I think that we have=20
> decided not=20
> >> to mandate it?
> > It's not in the current schema, from what I can see.
> >> My question now is,
> >> Is it ok to optionally allow an id in layers in an OWS Context=20
> >> document?
> >> Inserting an id makes it much easier to write transactions on the=20
> >> Context.
> > This would probably be best in AbstractResourceType.
> > Having said this, I haven't heard much on our current schema and=20
> > whether it's being used in OWS5 at all w.r.t. KML integration.
> > ..Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > Context.rwg mailing list
> > Context.rwg@...
> > https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg
> Context.rwg mailing list