On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Paul Lesniewski <paul@...> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Alexandros Vellis <avel@...> wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:35:54 -0800
>> Nick Sayer <nsayer@...> wrote:
>>> It probably would break a strict validation (4.0 Transitional, at
>>> least, doesn't list them). But every browser I've tried has either
>>> recognized the new types or fallen back to type='text' for unknown
>> (Why follow up off-list?)
>> Tomas — what Nick mentions above was my point. If it breaks HTML4
>> validation but nothing else, then I wouldn't mind adding it.
> I think everything else in SM validates, or at least that's the idea.
> Breaking validation intentionally is contrary to the project
> goals/spirit. At best, it should be a non-default configuration.
>> However, Paul mentioned in the discussion in thread "Changing STABLE
>> DOCTYPE?" that a <!DOCTYPE html> DTD can be added to the new scheme
>> easily. Is that still the case? Then we would also achieve HTML4
> Yes, it's easier, but still requires code changes. IMHO, if some
You can also simply use version 1.5.2 and make your own template set
that uses whatever kind of doctype and input tags that you want.
Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail!