Jody Cleveland zei:
>> A small note about the speed difference, it's fixed in the
>> devel branche.
> So, what was the problem?
from an earlier message: (I quote myself :-)
> Alternatively, Marc believes there may be something up with the UID
> message sorting in 1.4.0 involving parsing addresses. Fixing that may be
> an alternative.
Yes, due to some address parsing "enhancement" we have better support for
encoded addresses. The downside is that the parsing is expensive so I have
to figure out how to limit it for the displayable messages only instead of
the complete list (sorry, my mistake). With SORT enabled you won't notice
the speed difference due to the limited set of message headers retrieved
from the server
That was the idea I had, after that I looked at the source and 10 minutes
later the fix was there :-P
It's always easy to fix your own code / mistakes.