CEDET

Hi!

I wonder how dictionary variables are expanded by
srecode. Let's take following example. I have a template
mytemplate in context file defined for mode default where
comment_prefix is automatically calculated thanks to an
argument :myargument. In the method
srecode-semantic-handle-:myargument that I wrote to handle
argument :myargument there's an instruction like that :
(srecode-dictionary-set-value dict "comment_prefix"
			      mycommentprefix)

When inserting mytemplate in emacs-lisp mode, value of
comment_prefix given in srecode-el.srt is overridden by that
set by :myargument EXCEPT IN SECTIONS ! In sections, the value
of comment_prefix set by instruction set in srecode-el.srt is
used. 

Sure when inserting mytemplate in modes where no default
settings are provided, value of comment_prefix set by
srecode-semantic-handle-:myargument is used. 

Anyway I don't really understand variable scope at this
point. Do sections have their own dictionary that do not
inheritate from the active dictionary in current template ?

Sorry but I did not deeply investigate the code to discover how
it works and did not find any detail in the doc. 

Regards 

Pierre

Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? From: Eric M. Ludlam <eric@si...> - 2009-08-28 11:07 Your experience sounds like a bug to me. The dictionaries are supposed to stack, such that references in the section dictionaries should provide values from the next dictionary up in the tree of section dictionaries only if there is no value in the current dictionary. I added a test for this case, and ended up with a result that is the opposite of what you experienced. Thus, I expect I will need a simplified example template from you since I apparently created something different. I can then resolve these two inconsistencies, and add some nice tests for this case. Thanks Eric On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 04:41 +0200, Pierre Lorenzon wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder how dictionary variables are expanded by > srecode. Let's take following example. I have a template > mytemplate in context file defined for mode default where > comment_prefix is automatically calculated thanks to an > argument :myargument. In the method > srecode-semantic-handle-:myargument that I wrote to handle > argument :myargument there's an instruction like that : > (srecode-dictionary-set-value dict "comment_prefix" > mycommentprefix) > > When inserting mytemplate in emacs-lisp mode, value of > comment_prefix given in srecode-el.srt is overridden by that > set by :myargument EXCEPT IN SECTIONS ! In sections, the value > of comment_prefix set by instruction set in srecode-el.srt is > used. > > Sure when inserting mytemplate in modes where no default > settings are provided, value of comment_prefix set by > srecode-semantic-handle-:myargument is used. > > Anyway I don't really understand variable scope at this > point. Do sections have their own dictionary that do not > inheritate from the active dictionary in current template ? > > Sorry but I did not deeply investigate the code to discover how > it works and did not find any detail in the doc. > > Regards > > Pierre > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Cedet-devel mailing list > Cedet-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cedet-devel

Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? From: Pierre Lorenzon <devel@po...> - 2009-08-28 15:32 Attachments: tests.tar.bz2      Hi Eric! From: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@...> Subject: Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:07:03 -0400 > Your experience sounds like a bug to me. The dictionaries are supposed > to stack, such that references in the section dictionaries should > provide values from the next dictionary up in the tree of section > dictionaries only if there is no value in the current dictionary. > > I added a test for this case, and ended up with a result that is the > opposite of what you experienced. Thus, I expect I will need a > simplified example template from you since I apparently created > something different. I can then resolve these two inconsistencies, and > add some nice tests for this case. OK ! Here comes my tests. Top of file test.el was produced by inserting file:test template after having loaded test.el. You should notice that there's no space before X-RCS (using ";;" (the value defined in srecode-el.srt) as comment prefix) whereas there are spaces in front of the other lines using ";; " as prefix (produced by :automode argument.) In file test.tex there's no problem since for this mode there are no other settings. Regards Pierre

Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? From: Eric M. Ludlam <eric@si...> - 2009-08-29 02:00 Hi, Your attachment didn't decompress for me. I did find the bug in the variant that I created. The problem was that sub-dictionaries were erroneously being initialized from the dictionary state for a given major mode. When I eliminated that, it then worked for my example. I checked in my changes, and new tests for this case. Perhaps it will fix the problem with your example. Eric On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:32 +0200, Pierre Lorenzon wrote: > Hi Eric! > > From: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@...> > Subject: Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:07:03 -0400 > > > Your experience sounds like a bug to me. The dictionaries are supposed > > to stack, such that references in the section dictionaries should > > provide values from the next dictionary up in the tree of section > > dictionaries only if there is no value in the current dictionary. > > > > I added a test for this case, and ended up with a result that is the > > opposite of what you experienced. Thus, I expect I will need a > > simplified example template from you since I apparently created > > something different. I can then resolve these two inconsistencies, and > > add some nice tests for this case. > > OK ! Here comes my tests. Top of file test.el was produced by > inserting file:test template after having loaded test.el. > You should notice that there's no space before X-RCS (using > ";;" (the value defined in srecode-el.srt) as comment prefix) > whereas there are spaces in front of the other lines using > ";; " as prefix (produced by :automode argument.) > > In file test.tex there's no problem since for this mode there > are no other settings. > > Regards > > Pierre

Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? From: Pierre Lorenzon <devel@po...> - 2009-08-29 04:04 Hi, From: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@...> Subject: Re: [CEDET-devel] srecode variables scope ? Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:33:19 -0400 > Hi, > > Your attachment didn't decompress for me. I did find the bug in the Sorry ! > variant that I created. The problem was that sub-dictionaries were > erroneously being initialized from the dictionary state for a given > major mode. When I eliminated that, it then worked for my example. And apparently for mine as well ! Good ! Thanks ! PIerre

1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.