On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:31:37PM +0400, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:05:56PM +0200, M. Dietrich wrote:
> > how are thinks going on regarding transactions?
> What do you mean?
the doc states
Better transaction support -- right now you can use transactions for
the database, but the object isn't transaction-aware, so non-database
persistence won't be able to be rolled back.
i would like to see some kind of merge _lazyUpdate, no auto-commit and
caching and no further need for syncUpdate when commit is used.
someone else wrote a posting regarding caching and threading. this
also involves transactions.