On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:50:29AM +0100, Thomas wrote:
> I would like to know if it's a good (or bad) idea to put an uptodate
> 2.4.x kernel for the real host and to put 2.6.x for the uml host. I'm
> asking that because I'm not really sure that 2.6 is good for a
> production server but I red that 2.6.x has really good performance. So
> I'm confused...
See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.uml.devel/3328 - there seems be real
performance benefits from updating your UMLs to 2.6 even if you leave the
host at 2.4. The caveats about 2.6 not being widely used yet, hence there
may be stability problems that no one has noticed, still apply.