Aha, one of my many incomplete semanticdb projects. That can be
safely removed from the project file.
My work in progress is attempting to map a semanticdb database on top
of a .so file. Many .so files with debug info (STABS) can be dumped
with all the info a debugger needs, which could prove useful as a
source of API calls. I was hoping that one subclass would deal with
.so files, and another with .class or .jar files.
From the C case, header files are probably better. From the java
case, I think the .jar file is also the C header file equivalent, yes?
In the java case, I think javap could be used to extract the
information, and if not, a custom java file that used introspection
like the beanshell in JDE could be used to query the class file
directly, mapping standard semanticdb-search.el functions directly to
code in the introspection program.
>>> ryk@... seems to think that:
>It seems like mention of semanticdb-obj.el needs to be
>deleted from semantic/Project.ede, because I can't find that
>I can run "make" in semantic directory successfully after
>updating new Porject.ede from cvs db, run
>ede-proj-regenerate, then delete mention of
>semanticdb-obj.el from the resulting Makefile.
>>>>>> "EL" == Eric M Ludlam <eric@...> writes:
> EL> Hi,
> EL> As David pointed out, the Makefiles checked into semantic could not
> EL> be regenerated via EDE. To my dismay I found a plethora of changes
> EL> waiting to be checked in, so I did. Anyone who gets the new EDE files
> EL> should be able to rebuild the Makefiles in semantic in a way that
> EL> they will come close to what is in CVS. I'm getting clean builds on
> EL> both EDE and Semantic now.
> EL> I think the Project/Makefile may need to be double checked. I'll
> EL> look closer when I get a chance.
> EL> I also checked in the following semantic files:
> EL> semantic-c.el: support #elif
> EL> This may need porting back to v1p4
> EL> semantic-el.el: support defvar-mode-local
> EL> This is a nifty change that makes any language support file (like
> EL> semantic-el.el, for instance) look cool in speedbar, treating the mode
> EL> much like a class with externally defined methods in C++.
> EL> Despite David's request, I did not check in newly regenerated
> EL> Makefiles. I'm hoping for confirmation from others that I didn't
> EL> really mess something up in EDE first.
> EL> Enjoy
> EL> Eric
> EL> --
> EL> Eric Ludlam: zappo@..., eric@...
> EL> Home: http://www.ludlam.net Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
> EL> Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net GNU: http://www.gnu.org
> EL> -------------------------------------------------------
> EL> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> EL> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> EL> http://www.vasoftware.com
> EL> _______________________________________________
> EL> Cedet-devel mailing list
> EL> Cedet-devel@...
> EL> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cedet-devel
>This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
>SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
>Cedet-devel mailing list
Eric Ludlam: zappo@..., eric@...
Home: http://www.ludlam.net Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net GNU: http://www.gnu.org