CEDET

At Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:27:53 +0900,
Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@...> wrote:
>
> I made some improvements in semantic-make for practice.

Sorry, I sent a wrong version in previous mail.

rule: targets opt-whitespace colons opt-whitespace elements #commands

Remove # and C-c C-c, please. *sigh*

>>> Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@...> seems to think that:
>Hi,
>
>I made some improvements in semantic-make for practice. It can now
>handle rather complex makefile like the attached one. Remaining
>possible TODOs are:
>
> - Support BSD-make's makefile
> - Support Imakefile
> - Move to wisent??
>
>My next challenge would be semantic-awk or wisent-awk (not just a
>torture!)  or -xml or something. Anyone working on these? If there,
>please tell me. I take another way.
  [ ... ]

Hi,

  Thanks for the patch, and sorry about the delay.

  The patch itself seems fine, but I'm trying to understand what some
of the changes are for.  In particular, some of the whitespace stuff
is throwing me off, though I certainly understand the need to
differentiate whitespace.  I suspect that to do what you want will
require that the core lexer be able to provide whitespace.

  I'll let you know when I figure it out a bit better.

  I do not know of an awk parser, or anyone working on one.  If awk
wraps it's function bodies in some parenthetical form, either parser
will work.  If it does not, then wisent will be better.  Wisent is
better in general, though simple languages like the Makefile may be a
little easier in the current parser (I can't verify that assumption
yet).

  There is a program called `xml-parse' which parses XML files.  I've
been looking at it lately, and may write a filter to convert its
output to something that is semantic friendly.

Have fun
Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

At Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:56:36 -0500,
Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
>   The patch itself seems fine, but I'm trying to understand what some
> of the changes are for.  In particular, some of the whitespace stuff
> is throwing me off, though I certainly understand the need to
> differentiate whitespace.  I suspect that to do what you want will
> require that the core lexer be able to provide whitespace.

Sorry for complicated codings ;)

Actually, sometimes we might need something like
semantic-flex-enable-whitespaces or better solution.

>   There is a program called `xml-parse' which parses XML files.  I've
> been looking at it lately, and may write a filter to convert its
> output to something that is semantic friendly.

Good news :)

But currently we have (at least) two XML parsers for Emacs, xml.el and
xml-parse.el, though I don't know which one is better... (xml.el is
bundled with GNU Emacs 21)

>>> Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@...> seems to think that:
>At Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:56:36 -0500,
>Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
>>   The patch itself seems fine, but I'm trying to understand what some
>> of the changes are for.  In particular, some of the whitespace stuff
>> is throwing me off, though I certainly understand the need to
>> differentiate whitespace.  I suspect that to do what you want will
>> require that the core lexer be able to provide whitespace.
>
>Sorry for complicated codings ;)
>
>Actually, sometimes we might need something like
>semantic-flex-enable-whitespaces or better solution.

I checked in changes to semantic.el, semantic-make.el, and make.bnf
to accommodate what I saw in your patch.  It seems to be working for
me.  Could you get the latest from CVS and try it out?  Thanks.

>>   There is a program called `xml-parse' which parses XML files.  I've
>> been looking at it lately, and may write a filter to convert its
>> output to something that is semantic friendly.
>
>Good news :)
>
>But currently we have (at least) two XML parsers for Emacs, xml.el and
>xml-parse.el, though I don't know which one is better... (xml.el is
>bundled with GNU Emacs 21)

It has since occurred to me that using xml.el to parse, and
converting won't be useful since semantic requires buffer positional
information which isn't provided. :(

Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

At Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:43:13 -0500,
Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
>
> I checked in changes to semantic.el, semantic-make.el, and make.bnf
> to accommodate what I saw in your patch.  It seems to be working for
> me.  Could you get the latest from CVS and try it out?  Thanks.

Repository seems to be still old... is it normal?

>>> Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@...> seems to think that:
>At Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:43:13 -0500,
>Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
>>
>> I checked in changes to semantic.el, semantic-make.el, and make.bnf
>> to accommodate what I saw in your patch.  It seems to be working for
>> me.  Could you get the latest from CVS and try it out?  Thanks.
>
>Repository seems to be still old... is it normal?
  [ ... ]

My mistake.  You need to get the changes from the v1_4 branch.

Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 zappo@..., eric@...
   Home: http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo            Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: http://www.gnu.org

At Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:40:01 -0500,
Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
>
> >>> Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@...> seems to think that:
> >At Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:43:13 -0500,
> >Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> I checked in changes to semantic.el, semantic-make.el, and make.bnf
> >> to accommodate what I saw in your patch.  It seems to be working for
> >> me.  Could you get the latest from CVS and try it out?  Thanks.
> >
> >Repository seems to be still old... is it normal?
>   [ ... ]
>
> My mistake.  You need to get the changes from the v1_4 branch.

Aha! I found it. Works fine and much cleaner. Thanks!