Quoting klaus.berndl@...:
> Guillaume DE LAZZER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First we consider 2 files; ecb-test.h, and ecb-test.cpp:
> > First question:
> > When i edit ecb-test.cpp when i type Class1:: i do A-/ to try to
> > complete, but it purposes to me nothing, just the constructor and
> > destructor, is there some way to purpose me Hello function too ?
> > I tried semantic-ia-complete-symbol but semantic says "No context of
> > type function to advance in"
>
> The semantic-gurus should answer to this... ;-)
>
> >
> > Second question:
> > If we can resolve the first question, is it possible in ecb to have i=
n
> > methods window the possibility to see the methods of a class (when we
> > edit the .cpp file to see the function to code) ?
> >
> > Third question:
> > Is it possible to have in ecb the same system as Xrefactory, have a
> > "completion window" who will purpose us the possible (intelligent)
> > completion for what we writes and complete the (intelligent)
> > possibilities with a key binding. It will be very nice :)
>
> Both answers to question 2 and 3 are: Not yet but in future it should ;=
-)
> I agree with you that this would be nice and important for a full featu=
red
> IDE.
> Special remark to 3: Xrefactory and ECB can run together - just run
> Xref with in ECB - work like a charm....
Ok thx, but Xrefactory is a proprietary product, and if i understand corr=
ectly
what is marked on their site, it's limited in time (8days) no ? If it's t=
he cas
e i don't have 300$ for a license :(
--
Guillaume
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|