On Sep 10, 2005, at 8:11 PM, vrotaru wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:28:41 +0200, vrotaru wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>>
>
> I have somehow forgotten about "bugetiquette", so:
>
> system: Lunux-i386-2.6.12
> sbcl: 0.9.3
Thanks. But it reproduces fine for me with 0.9.4 on PPC/Darwin too.
And it seems that WHN has preceded me:
;; I think that a failure of this assertion means that we're
;; trying to access a variable which was improperly closed
;; over. The PHYSENV describes a physical environment. Every
;; variable that a form refers to should either be in its
;; physical environment directly, or grabbed from a
;; surrounding physical environment when it was closed over.
;; The ASSOC expression above finds closed-over variables, so
;; if we fell through the ASSOC expression, it wasn't closed
;; over. Therefore, it must be in our physical environment
;; directly. If instead it is in some other physical
;; environment, then it's bogus for us to reference it here
;; without it being closed over. -- WHN 2001-09-29
--
Brian Mastenbrook
brian@...
http://brian.mastenbrook.net/
|