Linux Test Project

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Masatake YAMATO <yamato@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some typos. I cannot remember but maybe I introduced.


Perhaps grammatically better would be "unexpected return value"?


> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO<yamato@...>
>
>
> Index: testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise01.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise01.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -r1.3 posix_fadvise01.c
> --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise01.c 22 Apr 2008 15:29:43 -0000      1.3
> +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise01.c 18 Jul 2008 07:39:58 -0000
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
>                                tst_resm(TPASS, "call succeeded expectedly");
>                        } else {
>                                tst_resm(TFAIL,
> -                                        "unexpected returnd value - %d : %s, advise %d - "
> +                                        "unexpected returned value - %d : %s, advise %d - "
>                                         "expected %d",
>                                         TEST_RETURN,
>                                         strerror(TEST_RETURN),
> Index: testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise03.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise03.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -r1.3 posix_fadvise03.c
> --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise03.c 22 Apr 2008 15:29:43 -0000      1.3
> +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise03.c 18 Jul 2008 07:39:58 -0000
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
>                                         strerror(TEST_RETURN));
>                        } else {
>                                tst_resm(TFAIL,
> -                                        "unexpected returnd value - %d : %s, advise %d - "
> +                                        "unexpected returned value - %d : %s, advise %d - "
>                                         "expected %d",
>                                         TEST_RETURN,
>                                         strerror(TEST_RETURN),
> Index: testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise04.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise04.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 posix_fadvise04.c
> --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise04.c 22 Apr 2008 15:29:43 -0000      1.4
> +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise04.c 18 Jul 2008 07:39:58 -0000
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
>                                         "returned value = %d : %s", TEST_RETURN,
>                                         strerror(TEST_RETURN));
>                        } else {
> -                               tst_resm(TFAIL, "unexpected returnd value - %d : %s - "
> +                               tst_resm(TFAIL, "unexpected returned value - %d : %s - "
>                                         "expected %d", TEST_RETURN,
>                                         strerror(TEST_RETURN), TC[i].error);
>                        }
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html

> > Hi,
> >
> > I found some typos. I cannot remember but maybe I introduced.
> 
> 
> Perhaps grammatically better would be "unexpected return value"?

You must be better.

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:55 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found some typos. I cannot remember but maybe I introduced.
> > 
> > 
> > Perhaps grammatically better would be "unexpected return value"?
> 
> You must be better.
> 

Thank you. Both of your concerns taken care of. Patch is merged.

Regards--
Subrata

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list