On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 06:42 +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
> You said that (for example) Gramps doesn't have LVG in its python files?
> Hence my question?
Yes, I said that and it is correct: LVG is not a standard type.
> So for every type value, the code has to check the hashmap?
Pretty much. How else could this be done, if we need to accommodate
both standard types and arbitrary custom types?
> any good xml will do, I can transform it.
> If I ask for it in Docbook format, others will complain it doesn't suite
> their xml :-)
> I'm guessing you are keying off the English?
> Should be sufficient for any transform.
OK. Still could you file an issue with our tracker?
I won't do it right now, and things do get forgotten.
Alexander Roitman http://gramps-project.org