Webware for Python

Cc:=20
Bcc:=20
Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] Re: Sprint?
Reply-To:=20
In-Reply-To: <20030320012235.GA6779@...>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19lowlatency-preempt

On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:22:35AM +0100, Jerome Kerdreux wrote:
=20
Is get several suggestions / questions.=20
=20
- What is a WebwareExperimental ?=20
- I really think webware should provide a "way of programming component",
  perhaps the UseKit is a good start. One of my big regret about
  Webware is the lack of standard API like security management/login/sess=
ion
  I don't say that webware need some big API =E0 la zope , but need a way=
 to=20
  write plugable component, and i think i'm not the only one tinking
  about that. We have several talk about this, mainly about
  'interface' or other choice.
=20
- Is there a chat room on irc during the sprint ?=20


Thanks :)=20
  =20

Re: [Webware-discuss] Sprint From: Tripp Lilley On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 soif@... wrote: > - What is a WebwareExperimental ? =09From http://sourceforge.net/projects/expwebware/ : =09This is an experimental refactoring of the Webware for Python =09project. It is NOT a fork, but a temporary project for exploring a =09new architecture. It is available under the same terms as the =09existing Webware project (webware.sf.net). See also: =09http://webware.colorstudy.com/twiki/bin/view/Webware/WebwareExpRefactori= ng > - I really think webware should provide a "way of programming component", > perhaps the UseKit is a good start. One of my big regret about > Webware is the lack of standard API like security management/login/sess= ion > I don't say that webware need some big API =E0 la zope , but need a way= to > write plugable component, and i think i'm not the only one tinking > about that. We have several talk about this, mainly about > 'interface' or other choice. I'm not really qualified to comment on this, since I've been a long time out of the loop. Someone else can take up the torch here :) > - Is there a chat room on irc during the sprint ? We have no explicit plans for it, but, then, we don't have anything stopping us from doing it. I know, personally, I probably -won't- be using IRC during the sprint, because I find it hard to focus and chat at the same time. I'm planning on using the sprint as a time to put my head down and delve deeply into Webware, documenting as I go, in preparation for some reworking I'll be doing over the next few months. I can't comment on whether or not the other sprinters will be IRCing :)

Re: [Webware-discuss] Sprint From: Ian Bicking <ianb@co...> - 2003-03-20 09:58 On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 19:24, soif@... wrote: > - What is a WebwareExperimental ?=20 Tavis rewrote Webware, trying to make to make the code tighter. That code has kind of been in limbo since. > - I really think webware should provide a "way of programming component= ", > perhaps the UseKit is a good start. One of my big regret about > Webware is the lack of standard API like security management/login/se= ssion > I don't say that webware need some big API =E0 la zope , but need a w= ay to=20 > write plugable component, and i think i'm not the only one tinking > about that. We have several talk about this, mainly about > 'interface' or other choice. I agree, but I'm really fuzzy on what exactly that would look like. I plan to sit in on some Zope component talk, maybe get some ideas (even if it's a reaction, not an imitation :). =20 > - Is there a chat room on irc during the sprint ?=20 There isn't any planned, but I wouldn't mind an IRC room for the sprint -- other people could join in even if they can't attend. Can you suggest a server/channel? Ian

1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.