On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 13:12, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> And it found out that the SDL driver, which is said experimental (and is
> clearly broken), is chosen over Xshm if Xv isn't present. How can I
> lower the priority of the SDL driver against Xshm ?
fixed, thanks for the notice.
it seems that priorities were lost when porting to new api...
btw, just to make things clearer: it's not xine sdl that is buggy. but
the redhat sdl rpms are built using a known broken nasm version (which
does really wrong things, software assembled with it does only work by