wxformbuilder-devel Mailing List for wxFormBuilder

Hi,

I have wxFormBuilder repo (https://github.com/wxFormBuilder/wxFormBuilder)
ready to go.

--
Regards,
Ryan

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Patrick Geltinger <pa...@pa...>
wrote:

> On 01.09.2016 17:01, Ryan Pusztai wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am very excited to see the interest in wxFormbuilder. I would love to
> have the development moved over to GitHub. I would be happy to start a
> project and add whoever would like to help the migration. SourceForge is
> not the best place for development anymore. I am a developer of
> wxFormbuilder, but I have moved to more web development so my role has
> changed to project management and would be open to new developers.
>
> I've created that organization as a placeholder (
>> https://github.com/wxFormBuilder), but I really hope the wxWidgets devs
>> say yes.
>
>
> I would like to be added as the owner/administrator or the wxFormBuilder
> organization please (rjpcomputing). I can migrate the code to 2 projects:
> 1) wxFormBuilder 2) wxAddition Plugin project. Now if the wxWidgets devs
> say it is ok to join their GitHub organization that can change.
>
> Please realize that wxFormBuilder is worked on from time to time. It
> doesn't seem dead. I see a commit from 3 months ago. The project isn't good
> about releasing. We would love new developers. Please consider this an
> official call for more developers.
>
> @Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel
>> free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that
>> nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where
>> to start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start?
>
>
> We would love the help. Please let me know your GitHub username and I will
> add anyone willing to help. I don't think I will be able to help too much.
>
> We are also open to CMake, so please feel free to change that.
>
> Please let me know what the next steps would be.
>
> I completely understand that.
> However it's really sad to see so little development on wxFB as it's
> arguably the best (free) RAD tool for wxWidgets.
> So if we could breathe some new life into the project, I'd be happy to
> help.
>
> It was the KiCAD developers who integrated CMake into wxFB.
> However they seem to tend more and more to hand coding dialogs, because
> they also thought wxFB to be (more or less) dead. [1]
>
> I'll be contacting them to ask if it's okay with them to use their work
> and port it back into the original repository as soon as it's on GitHub.
> I hope we can start as soon as Jan adds you to the organization. My GitHub
> username is patlkli.
>
> [1] https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg19729.html
>
>
> Best regards,
> Patrick
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>
>

On 01.09.2016 17:01, Ryan Pusztai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am very excited to see the interest in wxFormbuilder. I would love
> to have the development moved over to GitHub. I would be happy to
> start a project and add whoever would like to help the migration.
> SourceForge is not the best place for development anymore. I am a
> developer of wxFormbuilder, but I have moved to more web development
> so my role has changed to project management and would be open to new
> developers.
>
>     I've created that organization as a placeholder
>     (https://github.com/wxFormBuilder
>     <https://github.com/wxFormBuilder>), but I really hope the
>     wxWidgets devs say yes.
>
>  
> I would like to be added as the owner/administrator or the
> wxFormBuilder organization please (rjpcomputing). I can migrate the
> code to 2 projects: 1) wxFormBuilder 2) wxAddition Plugin project. Now
> if the wxWidgets devs say it is ok to join their GitHub organization
> that can change.
>
> Please realize that wxFormBuilder is worked on from time to time. It
> doesn't seem dead. I see a commit from 3 months ago. The project isn't
> good about releasing. We would love new developers. Please consider
> this an official call for more developers.
>
>     @Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs,
>     feel free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it
>     sad, that nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I
>     have no idea where to start contributing though. Maybe this would
>     be a good start? 
>
>
> We would love the help. Please let me know your GitHub username and I
> will add anyone willing to help. I don't think I will be able to help
> too much.
>
> We are also open to CMake, so please feel free to change that.
>
> Please let me know what the next steps would be.
>
I completely understand that.
However it's really sad to see so little development on wxFB as it's
arguably the best (free) RAD tool for wxWidgets.
So if we could breathe some new life into the project, I'd be happy to help.

It was the KiCAD developers who integrated CMake into wxFB.
However they seem to tend more and more to hand coding dialogs, because
they also thought wxFB to be (more or less) dead. [1]

I'll be contacting them to ask if it's okay with them to use their work
and port it back into the original repository as soon as it's on GitHub.
I hope we can start as soon as Jan adds you to the organization. My
GitHub username is patlkli.

[1] https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg19729.html


Best regards,
Patrick

On 01.09.2016 16:25, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, at 15:42, Patrick Geltinger wrote:
>> Of course, it would certainly do no harm to ask on wx-dev whether
>> there's any interest in merging wxFB into the wxWidgets organization.
> Let's try: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wx-dev/LwfeyNK-Zxo
I expected Bryan's answer to be like this. I see licensing as the most
problematic factor here.
I think, that using the wxFB organization would fit best.
>> If not, there should just be a wxFormBuilder organization and a single
>> wxFormBuilder respository in it, for now.
> I've created that organization as a placeholder (https://github.com/wxFormBuilder), but I really hope the wxWidgets devs say yes.
Great!
Since Ryan is the only current wxFB maintainer to react, I think it
would be great to have him as an admin on GitHub as well.
>
>> I'll try and contact the wxFB admins, maybe they aren't even subscribed
>> to this list...
> Perfect! I think it's even possible to migrate issues from SF to GitHub, isn't it?
Should be possible. Ryan already said he could migrate the wxFB and
wxAdditions repositories to GitHub. Maybe he could migrate the tracker
as well?

Hi,

I am very excited to see the interest in wxFormbuilder. I would love to
have the development moved over to GitHub. I would be happy to start a
project and add whoever would like to help the migration. SourceForge is
not the best place for development anymore. I am a developer of
wxFormbuilder, but I have moved to more web development so my role has
changed to project management and would be open to new developers.

I've created that organization as a placeholder (https://github.com/
> wxFormBuilder), but I really hope the wxWidgets devs say yes.


I would like to be added as the owner/administrator or the wxFormBuilder
organization please (rjpcomputing). I can migrate the code to 2 projects:
1) wxFormBuilder 2) wxAddition Plugin project. Now if the wxWidgets devs
say it is ok to join their GitHub organization that can change.

Please realize that wxFormBuilder is worked on from time to time. It
doesn't seem dead. I see a commit from 3 months ago. The project isn't good
about releasing. We would love new developers. Please consider this an
official call for more developers.

@Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel free
> to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that nothing
> happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where to
> start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start?


We would love the help. Please let me know your GitHub username and I will
add anyone willing to help. I don't think I will be able to help too much.

We are also open to CMake, so please feel free to change that.

Please let me know what the next steps would be.

--
Regards,
Ryan

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Patrick Geltinger <pa...@pa...>
wrote:

> Considering Vadim Zeitlin's response to the last time someone tried to
> post a patch for wxFB to the wx-users mailing list [1],
> I'd say that with the current state of wxFB there is little chance to
> get it in the wxWidgets organization.
>
> No one seems to know, who is currently developing wxFB and considering
> the complete lack of response and overall activity
> here I'm not sure, if anyone is currently considering him-/herself the
> maintainer of wxFB.
>
> Of course, it would certainly do no harm to ask on wx-dev whether
> there's any interest in merging wxFB into the wxWidgets organization.
> If not, there should just be a wxFormBuilder organization and a single
> wxFormBuilder respository in it, for now.
>
> I'll try and contact the wxFB admins, maybe they aren't even subscribed
> to this list...
>
>
> [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/wx-users/_a7qD7UMfjQ/hgfbxWjVAwAJ
>
>
> On 01.09.2016 11:40, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, at 17:24, Patrick Geltinger wrote:
> >> Why would GitLab be better?
> >>  The userbase on GitHub is larger, it's better known and far more
> responsive than GitLab IMHO.
> >>
> >>  There already are countless forks and mirrors of wxFormBuilder on
> GitHub, including one which includes CMake build files to get rid of
> premake which would definitely ease the first steps for contributors:
> >>  https://github.com/marekr/wxFormBuilder
> >>
> >>  I'd definitely appreciate any migration away from SF, no matter if it
> is GitHub, Bitbucket or GitLab.
> >>  I have several bugfixes in wxFB ready to submit, but I really don't
> want to do this on SourceForge.
> >>
> >>  @Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel
> free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that
> nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where
> to start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start?
> >>
> >> Am 31. August 2016 16:50:07 MESZ, schrieb Robert Pollak <
> rob...@jk...>:
> >>> At 2016-08-31 16:35, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> >>>>  [Have] you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub
> >>>>  / Bitbucket?
> >>> Or, even better: GitLab?
> > I also think that GitHub would be better, especially because wxWidgets
> itself is there: https://github.com/wxWidgets
> >
> > IMHO making wxFormBuilder a project of the wxWidgets organization would
> be perfect. Does someone know one of the maintainers of that organization?
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, at 15:42, Patrick Geltinger wrote:
> Of course, it would certainly do no harm to ask on wx-dev whether
> there's any interest in merging wxFB into the wxWidgets organization.

Let's try: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wx-dev/LwfeyNK-Zxo

> If not, there should just be a wxFormBuilder organization and a single
> wxFormBuilder respository in it, for now.

I've created that organization as a placeholder (https://github.com/wxFormBuilder), but I really hope the wxWidgets devs say yes.

> I'll try and contact the wxFB admins, maybe they aren't even subscribed
> to this list...

Perfect! I think it's even possible to migrate issues from SF to GitHub, isn't it?

Considering Vadim Zeitlin's response to the last time someone tried to
post a patch for wxFB to the wx-users mailing list [1],
I'd say that with the current state of wxFB there is little chance to
get it in the wxWidgets organization.

No one seems to know, who is currently developing wxFB and considering
the complete lack of response and overall activity
here I'm not sure, if anyone is currently considering him-/herself the
maintainer of wxFB.

Of course, it would certainly do no harm to ask on wx-dev whether
there's any interest in merging wxFB into the wxWidgets organization.
If not, there should just be a wxFormBuilder organization and a single
wxFormBuilder respository in it, for now.

I'll try and contact the wxFB admins, maybe they aren't even subscribed
to this list...


[1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/wx-users/_a7qD7UMfjQ/hgfbxWjVAwAJ


On 01.09.2016 11:40, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, at 17:24, Patrick Geltinger wrote:
>> Why would GitLab be better? 
>>  The userbase on GitHub is larger, it's better known and far more responsive than GitLab IMHO. 
>>  
>>  There already are countless forks and mirrors of wxFormBuilder on GitHub, including one which includes CMake build files to get rid of premake which would definitely ease the first steps for contributors:
>>  https://github.com/marekr/wxFormBuilder
>>  
>>  I'd definitely appreciate any migration away from SF, no matter if it is GitHub, Bitbucket or GitLab. 
>>  I have several bugfixes in wxFB ready to submit, but I really don't want to do this on SourceForge. 
>>  
>>  @Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where to start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start? 
>>
>> Am 31. August 2016 16:50:07 MESZ, schrieb Robert Pollak <rob...@jk...>:
>>> At 2016-08-31 16:35, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
>>>>  [Have] you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub
>>>>  / Bitbucket?
>>> Or, even better: GitLab?
> I also think that GitHub would be better, especially because wxWidgets itself is there: https://github.com/wxWidgets
>
> IMHO making wxFormBuilder a project of the wxWidgets organization would be perfect. Does someone know one of the maintainers of that organization?
>

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, at 17:24, Patrick Geltinger wrote:
> Why would GitLab be better? 
>  The userbase on GitHub is larger, it's better known and far more responsive than GitLab IMHO. 
>  
>  There already are countless forks and mirrors of wxFormBuilder on GitHub, including one which includes CMake build files to get rid of premake which would definitely ease the first steps for contributors:
>  https://github.com/marekr/wxFormBuilder
>  
>  I'd definitely appreciate any migration away from SF, no matter if it is GitHub, Bitbucket or GitLab. 
>  I have several bugfixes in wxFB ready to submit, but I really don't want to do this on SourceForge. 
>  
>  @Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where to start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start? 
> 
> Am 31. August 2016 16:50:07 MESZ, schrieb Robert Pollak <rob...@jk...>:
>> At 2016-08-31 16:35, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
>>>  [Have] you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub
>>>  / Bitbucket?
>> 
>> Or, even better: GitLab?

I also think that GitHub would be better, especially because wxWidgets itself is there: https://github.com/wxWidgets

IMHO making wxFormBuilder a project of the wxWidgets organization would be perfect. Does someone know one of the maintainers of that organization?

Why would GitLab be better? 
The userbase on GitHub is larger, it's better known and far more responsive than GitLab IMHO. 

There already are countless forks and mirrors of wxFormBuilder on GitHub, including one which includes CMake build files to get rid of premake which would definitely ease the first steps for contributors:
https://github.com/marekr/wxFormBuilder

I'd definitely appreciate any migration away from SF, no matter if it is GitHub, Bitbucket or GitLab. 
I have several bugfixes in wxFB ready to submit, but I really don't want to do this on SourceForge. 

@Maintainers: If you need any help with migrating or fixing bugs, feel free to ask. I like using wxFB and use it a lot, so I find it sad, that nothing happens and development seems to have stopped. I have no idea where to start contributing though. Maybe this would be a good start? 

Am 31. August 2016 16:50:07 MESZ, schrieb Robert Pollak <rob...@jk...>:
>At 2016-08-31 16:35, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
>> [Have] you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub
>> / Bitbucket?
>
>Or, even better: GitLab?
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
>Wxf...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel

At 2016-08-31 16:35, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> [Have] you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub
> / Bitbucket?

Or, even better: GitLab?

Hi,

I'm using wxFormbuilder a lot, but it seems not a lot of development is happening lately, which might be due to SVN and SourceForge. Did you ever thought of migrating wxFormBuilder to Git and GitHub / Bitbucket?

Jan Niklas

Hi,

I have a custom container class that accepts widgets as children, but
already has a default sizer. Is there a way I can have wxFormbuilder
attach children to a wxPanel derived object without adding a sizer?

   Simon

Hi,
I'm having problems with wxFormBuilder 3.5, mostly due to my ignorance but also because
- the wxformbuilder.org website disappeared around 2010-2011 ?
- the wiki on sourceforge is empty (there used to be one on the old webpage I think ?)

The scenario is this -
1) create a wxframe with a button
2) Set the button's OnButtonClick event to, say, "block_mod"
3) generate code
4) generate inherited class.

So, the generated base class looks something like this (heavily abridged of course)
******
class AUDframeBase : public wxFrame
{
        protected:
                wxButton* btn_modblock;
               
                // Virtual event handlers, overide them in your derived class
                void block_mod( wxCommandEvent& event );
}

/* constructor; auto-generated code*/
AUDframeBase::AUDframeBase(....)
{
    btn_modblock = new wxButton( ....);
    // Connect Events
    btn_modblock->Connect( wxEVT_COMMAND_BUTTON_CLICKED, wxCommandEventHandler( AUDframeBase::block_mod ), NULL, this );
}
*******

Then, as I understand, the idea is to have the implementation of the "block_mod()" function inside the derived class, so that I won't need to modify the wxFB-generated code. But this approach doesn't work; the linker complains about undefined references to "block_mode" inside the AUDframeBase constructor.
And, I've seen some example code that instead declares block_mod() with the "virtual" keyword, but I'm not sure of the implications of that.  If it's the correct way to do this, how do I get wxFB to make those functions virtual by default ?

Any hints?
Thanks !

Hi, I've been using wxFormBuilder on various C++ projects successfully but
now I need to use wxFreeChart from the wxCode component collection.  Is
there a way to integrate wxFreeChart or other components into a
wxFormBuilder-style app without hand editing the generated MainFrame class
in the file that says "PLEASE DO "NOT" EDIT THIS FILE!"?

Hi all,it is possible to increase the size of the fonts and the icons used in the GUI?They are very small and difficult to read.
Thanks 
Saverio

Hi all,it is possible to increase the size of the fonts and the icons used in the GUI?They are very small and difficult to read.
Thanks 
Saverio

Hi thanks for the help!

Saludos / Best regards

Mario Lacunza
Email:: mla...@gm...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Skype: mlacunzav

Lima - Peru

2016-02-18 5:02 GMT-05:00 Chris Green <cl...@is...>:

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:35:25PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
> >    excellent! but how you did this:
> >
> >    Then get it into the library search path:-
> >        export
> >    LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0
> >
> It's line wrapped.
>
> Simply, at the command prompt:-
>     export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/..............
>
> Then run the command (or commands) that need that library to be
> explicitly loaded.  The 'export' will set the LD_PRELOAD value for
> anything run later in that terminal session.
>
> If you need it for an IDE I guess you could do the export and then
> start the IDE from the command prompt.  If you're just doing a
> configure/make at the command line then just precede them with the
> export.
>
> Some shells (if you aren't using bash) require the export to be on a
> separate line:-
>
>     chris$
> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0
>     chris$ export LD_PRELOAD
>     chris$
>
> (I'm assuming you're doing this on Linux but it should be about the
> same for other Unix'ish systems)
>
> Sorry if this is all very obvious and I have misunderstood your
> question!  :-)
>
> --
> Chris Green
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>

Under the "Project" tree item find the "code-generation" Add it to the list
using ',' (commas) or just overwrite it with "XRC". Hope that helps.

--
Regards,
Ryan

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Chris Green <cl...@is...> wrote:

> Sounds a silly question but I can't see how to do it.
>
> How do you save the XRC as a file?
>
> --
> Chris Green
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>

Sounds a silly question but I can't see how to do it.

How do you save the XRC as a file?

-- 
Chris Green

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:35:25PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
>    excellent! but how you did this:
> 
>    Then get it into the library search path:-
>        export
>    LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0
> 
It's line wrapped.

Simply, at the command prompt:-
    export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/..............

Then run the command (or commands) that need that library to be
explicitly loaded.  The 'export' will set the LD_PRELOAD value for
anything run later in that terminal session.

If you need it for an IDE I guess you could do the export and then
start the IDE from the command prompt.  If you're just doing a
configure/make at the command line then just precede them with the
export.

Some shells (if you aren't using bash) require the export to be on a
separate line:-

    chris$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0
    chris$ export LD_PRELOAD
    chris$ 

(I'm assuming you're doing this on Linux but it should be about the
same for other Unix'ish systems)

Sorry if this is all very obvious and I have misunderstood your
question!  :-)

-- 
Chris Green

excellent! but how you did this:

Then get it into the library search path:-
    export
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0

Enviado desde mi LG G3
El 17/02/2016 16:53, "Chris Green" <cl...@is...> escribió:

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
> >    Yes I opened that bug report in 2014 but its not fixed yet and the
> >    workaround dont work :( thanks!
> >
> After a bit of playing around I can get the "import wx.html2" to work
> OK.
>
>
> On my [x]ubuntu 15.10 system I had install the libwxgtk-webview3.0-0v5
> package:-
>     apt-get install libwxgtk-webview3.0-0v5
>
> Then get it into the library search path:-
>     export
> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0
>
> ...and then I can import wx.html2:-
>
>     chris$ python
>     Python 2.7.10 (default, Oct 14 2015, 16:09:02)
>     [GCC 5.2.1 20151010] on linux2
>     Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>     >>> import wx.html2
>     >>>
>
>
> --
> Chris Green
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
>    Yes I opened that bug report in 2014 but its not fixed yet and the
>    workaround dont work :( thanks!
> 
After a bit of playing around I can get the "import wx.html2" to work
OK.


On my [x]ubuntu 15.10 system I had install the libwxgtk-webview3.0-0v5
package:-
    apt-get install libwxgtk-webview3.0-0v5

Then get it into the library search path:-
    export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_webview-3.0.so.0.2.0

...and then I can import wx.html2:-

    chris$ python
    Python 2.7.10 (default, Oct 14 2015, 16:09:02) 
    [GCC 5.2.1 20151010] on linux2
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> import wx.html2
    >>> 


-- 
Chris Green

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
>    Yes I opened that bug report in 2014 but its not fixed yet and the
>    workaround dont work :( thanks!
> 
Oh dear!  I guess I'll use the XRC file then.

-- 
Chris Green

Yes I opened that bug report in 2014 but its not fixed yet and the
workaround dont work :( thanks!

Saludos / Best regards

Mario Lacunza
Email:: mla...@gm...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Skype: mlacunzav

Lima - Peru

2016-02-17 5:07 GMT-05:00 Chris Green <cl...@is...>:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:00:13PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
> >    Hi
> >    I have some problems with the wxpython, when you installed
> >    wxformbuilder are you using the by default wxpython from ubuntu? wich
> >    version is it?
> >    can you run this code?
> >    import wx
> >    import wx.html2 as webview
>
> I get an undefined symbol with the second import.  It's a known Ubuntu
> bug that has been around for quite a while.  There is a workaround,
> see:-
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wxwidgets3.0/+bug/1388847
>
> (I had to type that so there *might* be errors, my mouse has gone crazy)
>
> --
> Chris Green
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:00:13PM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote:
>    Hi
>    I have some problems with the wxpython, when you installed
>    wxformbuilder are you using the by default wxpython from ubuntu? wich
>    version is it?
>    can you run this code?
>    import wx
>    import wx.html2 as webview

I get an undefined symbol with the second import.  It's a known Ubuntu
bug that has been around for quite a while.  There is a workaround,
see:-

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wxwidgets3.0/+bug/1388847

(I had to type that so there *might* be errors, my mouse has gone crazy)

-- 
Chris Green

Hi

I have some problems with the wxpython, when you installed wxformbuilder
are you using the by default wxpython from ubuntu? wich version is it?

can you run this code?

import wx
import wx.html2 as webview


Im attaching a python file, when I run it I got an error for that reason I
need to compile wxpython myself but the latest version of wxformbuilder
dont work :(


Saludos / Best regards

Mario Lacunza
Email:: mla...@gm...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Skype: mlacunzav

Lima - Peru

2016-02-16 17:11 GMT-05:00 Chris Green <cl...@is...>:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:17:54PM +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:31:12PM -0500, Ryan Pusztai wrote:
> > >    Chris,
> > >    wxFormBuilder is released on the PPA. Hope that helps.
> > >
> > Brilliant, thank you, installing it this minute!  :-)
> >
> ... and it's excellent, really easy to find one's way around.  I've
> already knocked together the basic layuout I need for a program I'm
> writing.
>
> Just one thing, Python code generation isn't available in the version
> from the PPA.  Will I have to use the XRC from Python or will the
> Python code generation be available quite soon?
>
> I guess that using the XRC from Python does have the advantage of
> separating the event handling Python from the GUI layout but it does
> mean the 'program' becomes at least two files.
>
> --
> Chris Green
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Wxformbuilder-devel mailing list
> Wxf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxformbuilder-devel
>