I hear that same sound. Hmm.
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>
> It's sounding to me like ThreadedAppServer would be a better default than
> the Async version.
>
> -Chuck
>
> At 05:54 PM 8/27/00 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
>
> >Asyncore seems to work best under Linux. Under NT, and I guess BSD, it
> >is slower. There's an issue going on that I haven't figured out yet.
> >
> >Geoff's suggestions didn't help with the speed issue. I'm surprised
> >it's slow under BSD, though. I had noted that, but I figured it was
> >something funky with my BSD setup.
> >
> >The benefit to asyncore is probably marginal on anything but a heavily
> >loaded site. It will be slower for lightly loaded sites.
> >
> >Jay
> >
> >Daniel Green wrote:
> > >
> > > What exactly is the difference between AsyncThreadedAppServer and
> > > ThreadedAppServer? 'cause the asyncore version seems to be a couple dozen
> > > times slower on my machine (running OpenBSD 2.7). Comments by the author of
> > > asyncore suggest that it is most useful under Windows NT. Any confirmation
> > > on this?
> > >
> > > Dan Green
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Webware-discuss mailing list
> > > Webware-discuss@...
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
> >_______________________________________________
> >Webware-discuss mailing list
> >Webware-discuss@...
> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-discuss mailing list
> Webware-discuss@...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/webware-discuss
|