On Sunday 02 December 2001 08:07 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> On Sunday 02 December 2001 18:40, you wrote:
> > I did a :
> > cvs -q tag Release-0.6
> > So if we need to get back to the 0.6 files for 0.6.x maintenance
> > releases, we can.
> Why not create a DEVEL_BRANCH for 0.7 and keep the HEAD_BRANCH for
> 0.6.x? That way people can have both checked out concurrently. The
> development on 0.7 will probably lead to periods where the codebase
> is broken while architectural changes are rolled out.
You're idea for having multiple branches is something I agree with. But
HEAD is always for current development. If we decide that we need a 0.6.1,
then we create a branch for it and do it. In fact, we already did this