> >Making [lrepeat] gratuitously different from
> >[list repeat] seems like an even worse misstep.
> But how would I use [struct::list repeat] syntax to generate a list like
> a b c a b c a b c
My only concern is consistency. It appears that "struct version 2"
is in development, so I'll see about converting [struct::list repeat]
to agree with [lrepeat].
| Don Porter Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division |
| donald.porter@... Information Technology Laboratory |
| http://math.nist.gov/~DPorter/ NIST |