SQuirreL SQL Client

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Ott [mailto:victor.ott@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2003 3:04
> To: squirrel-sql-develop@...
> Subject: Re: [Squirrel-sql-develop] Mac OS X Java 1.4.1 -- What went
> wrong?
> 
> 
> Sun released the "update 1" for Java 1.4.1 for MacOS X (~40MB). Has 
> someone already tested if the issues SquirrelSQL was 
> ecnountering were 
> solved?
> 
> -- 

I haven't had any feedback. However a message has been sent to the jEdit
mailing list about the new version of Java. One of the complaints was that
jEdit was less stable under the new Java 1.4

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jedit-users&m=106332681215085&w=2

Col

Hi,

I've given up on trying to do either a roadmap or schedule. The amount
of time that people can contribute varys enormously as work and personal
commitments change. However I can say that I want to have the stable
version of 1.2 released before the end of the year.

--
Colin Bell
http://squirrel-sql.sf.net

----- Original Message -----
From: o735v@...
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2003 0:06 am
Subject: [Squirrel-sql-develop] Roadmap / time schedule for SquirrelSQL?

> Hi,
> 
> just wanted to ask if there is a time schedule or road map for 
> SquirrelSQL?
> Thanks,
> Vic
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Squirrel-sql-develop mailing list
> Squirrel-sql-develop@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrel-sql-develop
>

Hi,

just wanted to ask if there is a time schedule or road map for SquirrelSQL?

Thanks,
Vic

Sun released the "update 1" for Java 1.4.1 for MacOS X (~40MB). Has=20
someone already tested if the issues SquirrelSQL was ecnountering were=20
solved?

--=20
Freundliche Gr=FC=DFe/Kind Regards       Victor Ott
Salutari cordiale/Saludos cordiales  victor.ott at q-dsl dot de


Colin Bell wrote:
> I'm going on hearsay myself as I don't use OS X so some of this could b=
e
> wrong.
>=20
> I know of a couple of organizations that are sticking with java 1.3 on
> OS X until 1.4 "stabilizes". These are desktop installs, not server.
> Exactly what problems they're having I don't know.
>=20
> There are some Swing issues where Java just crashes. They sound similar=

> to the DirectX issues that some video drivers have with 1.4 under Windo=
ws.
>=20
> The Swing printing code isn't in the OS X version. This doesn't affect
> SQuirreL as there is currently no print facility in it but having a
> chunk of Swing missing makes me nervous.
>=20
> --
> Colin Bell
> http://squirrel-sql.sf.net
[...]