> Is there anything specifically new in 1.4.1 from 1.3.1 that you
> are
> hoping to incorporate directly, that can't be done how it is
> currently
> (i.e. checking for existence of 1.4.1 specific classes and only
> then
> loading appropriate classes via reflection)?
There are a couple of reasons I want to move to 1.4. Firstly there have
been a number of issues with 1.3, mainly Swing problems that go away
with 1.4. Having to test everything with 1.3 as well as 1.4 has been a
real pain, not to mention developing workarounds for bugs in 1.3.
Secondly there are new features in 1.4 that will be useful. regex, JSSE,
new drag and drop architecture etc. Yes these can be accessed via
reflection but it means that any functionality that relies on them will
not be available when running on 1.3.
Eventually I will drop support for JDK 1.3. At the latest it will be
when Sun bring out their first release of java 1.5. However I would like
to do it before then.
> The JDK 1.4.1 update for Mac OS X is optional, and I'm actually
> working
> with a development group who is specifically avoiding the upgrade.
> They
> may not be alone in this regard.
All upgrades are optional but there comes a time when you have to apply
them or nothing will run. I can understand taking your time with the
upgrade, as regression testing etc would be required but avoiding it
puzzles me. Are there known problems with the upgrade that would make
people avoid it?
--
Colin Bell
http://squirrel-sql.sf.net
----- Original Message -----
From: Lynn Pye <lynn@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 12:10 pm
Subject: [Squirrel-sql-develop] Re: SQuirreL 1.1 and JDK 1.4
> The JDK 1.4.1 update for Mac OS X is optional, and I'm actually
> working
> with a development group who is specifically avoiding the upgrade.
> They
> may not be alone in this regard.
>
> Is there anything specifically new in 1.4.1 from 1.3.1 that you
> are
> hoping to incorporate directly, that can't be done how it is
> currently
> (i.e. checking for existence of 1.4.1 specific classes and only
> then
> loading appropriate classes via reflection)?
>
> Lynn
>
> On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:38 PM,
> squirrel-sql-develop-request@... wrote:
>
> >
> > Message: 1
> > From: Colin Bell <colbelloz@...>
> > To: squirrel-sql-develop@...,
> > squirrel-sql-users@...
> > Reply-To: colbelloz@...
> > Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:06:24 +1000
> > Subject: [Squirrel-sql-develop] SQuirreL 1.1 and JDK 1.4
> >
> > Now that Apple has finally released Java 1.4 for OS X, all the
> > platforms
> > that SQuirreL runs on have Java 1.4. I'd like to make 1.4.0 the
> minimum> version of Java required for the next release of SQuirreL.
> >
> > Are there any objections to this?
> >
> > --
> > Colin Bell
> > http://squirrel-sql.sf.net
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Squirrel-sql-develop mailing list
> Squirrel-sql-develop@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrel-sql-develop
>
|