Should we go ahead and commit the changes in Layer3.pm to load the
I think enough time has passed and I'd like to move forward with this.
On 8/16/10 5:42 AM, j.vaningenschenau@... wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>>> I have a full diff for Layer3.pm to load the IPv6 class, it also
>>> includes the POD additions. After committing Ipv6.pm I sent the diff
>>> for Layer3.pm to the wrong lists, I believe Max picked it up and
>>> forwarded it. I didn't want to commit the revised version of
>>> Layer3.pm before a couple of people have tested the IPv6 class.
>> I should have been more clear in my previous e-mail. I did receive
>> diff for Layer3.pm, and I carefully added one line at a time by hand
>> (except the POD). The one line that was missing, which was causing
>> the CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB to not load was this:
>> @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
>> + %SNMP::Info::Ipv6::MIBS,
>> 'IP-MIB' => 'ipNetToMediaIfIndex',
>> 'OSPF-MIB' => 'ospfRouterId',
>> 'BGP4-MIB' => 'bgpIdentifier',
>> so you might want to verify your Layer3.pm to make sure that this line
>> is included.
> Ah, I see it now, well noticed. Strange that it worked in my test
> though... Made the correction in my local copy, so it will be present in
> Layer3.pm when I commit it.
> Jeroen van Ingen
> ICT Service Centre
> University of Twente, P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands