2007: 2008: 2009: 2010: 2011: 2012: 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May (26) Jun (12) Jul (9) Aug (20) Sep (12) Oct (18) Nov (4) Dec (7) Jan (5) Feb (2) Mar (8) Apr May (2) Jun (2) Jul (23) Aug (5) Sep (2) Oct (7) Nov (5) Dec (12) Jan (2) Feb (2) Mar (7) Apr (2) May Jun (1) Jul Aug Sep (3) Oct (2) Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar (1) Apr (1) May Jun Jul (2) Aug (3) Sep Oct Nov Dec (1) Jan Feb (1) Mar Apr (1) May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb (1) Mar (1) Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep (1) Oct Nov Dec (12) Jan (2) Feb (8) Mar (3) Apr (20) May Jun Jul (3) Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
(3) (1) (4)
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(9)
14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31
(1)
 sipp-devel sipp-users sipp-commits Nested Flat Threaded Ultimate Show 25 Show 50 Show 75 Show 100
 [Sipp-devel] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Michael Hirschbichler - 2007-10-10 07:50 ```Hi all! Just had a (awkward) discussion with a representative of a commercial SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp. Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured cps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for statistics. I'm not curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT, but just the current "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp. I think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki, thanks in advance and BR Michael -- Michael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing. Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation Technische Universitaet Wien A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388 Tel: +43 1 58801 38846 ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Peter Higginson - 2007-10-10 08:38 Attachments: Message as HTML ```I=27m biased=2C but I usually answer that question in this way=3A =20 1=29 We have about 100 testing stations running SIPP =28PCs running Linu= x=29=2C how much would that cost with the commercial product=2E =28Most commercial= products are trying to sell systems for 100K while a Linux costs me 1K=2E= =29 2=29 Most commercial systems say =22you can write whatever tests you wan= t=22=3B we already have about 5000 test scripts for our product=2E How many do they= have for testing gateways=3F 3=29 For SIP messages=2C a Linux can do about 1000 messages per second= =2E I don=27t often need more=2C but we do run tests with multiple Linux systems= generating the traffic=2E =20 The only areas where I find Linux limiting are media generation and multipl= e IP addresses=2E For high rate media tests we get media generation done by o= ne of our own cards with call information supplied by SIPP =28to get 2G of med= ia per card used=29 and I have written Linux program that can emulate 250K IP= addresses behind a router=2E =20 Peter =20 Peter Higginson Newport Networks Ltd=2C http=3A//www=2Enewport-networks=2Ecom/ =20 -----Original Message----- From=3A sipp-users-bounces=40lists=2Esourceforge=2Enet =5Bmailto=3Asipp-users-bounces=40lists=2Esourceforge=2Enet=5D On Behalf Of= Michael Hirschbichler Sent=3A 10 October 2007 08=3A50 To=3A sipp-users=40lists=2Esourceforge=2Enet=3B sipp-devel=40lists=2Esource= forge=2Enet Subject=3A =5BSipp-users=5D SIPp Performance - High-Score=3F =20 Hi all! =20 Just had a =28awkward=29 discussion with a representative of a commercial= SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp=2E =20 Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured cps-rate of a =27usual=27 INVITE-scenario - just for statistics=2E I=27m no= t curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT=2C but just the current =22cps - high-score=22=2C You ever archived with SIPp=2E =20 I think=2C this fact would also be useful for the wiki=2C =20 thanks in advance and BR Michael =20 --=20 Michael Hirschbichler=2C Dipl=2E-Ing=2E Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation Technische Universitaet Wien A-1040 Wien=2C Favoritenstr=2E 9-11/388 Tel=3A +43 1 58801 38846 =20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF=2Enet email is sponsored by=3A Splunk Inc=2E Still grepping through log files to find problems=3F Stop=2E Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser=2E= Download your FREE copy of Splunk now =3E=3E http=3A//get=2Esplunk=2Ecom/= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users=40lists=2Esourceforge=2Enet https=3A//lists=2Esourceforge=2Enet/lists/listinfo/sipp-users ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information=2E If you are not the intended recipient =28or have received this e-mail in er= ror=29 please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail=2E Any unauthorized co= pying=2C disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly forbi= dden=2E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------ Newport Networks Limited is registered in England=2E Registration number 40= 67591=2E Registered office=3A 6 St=2E Andrew Street=2C London EC4A 3LX ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------ ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Olivier Jacques - 2007-10-10 08:45 Attachments: Message as HTML ```There has been reports (late 2006) of 2000 UAC scenarios/s on a single Linux box. But SIPp has evolved so much (for the better) since then... On 10/10/07, Peter Higginson wrote: > > I'm biased, but I usually answer that question in this way: > > > > 1) We have about 100 testing stations running SIPP (PCs running Linux), > how much would that cost with the commercial product. (Most commercial > products are trying to sell systems for 100K while a Linux costs me 1K.) > > 2) Most commercial systems say "you can write whatever tests you want"; > we already have about 5000 test scripts for our product. How many do they > have for testing gateways? > > 3) For SIP messages, a Linux can do about 1000 messages per second. I > don't often need more, but we do run tests with multiple Linux systems > generating the traffic. > > > > The only areas where I find Linux limiting are media generation and > multiple IP addresses. For high rate media tests we get media generation > done by one of our own cards with call information supplied by SIPP (to get > 2G of media per card used) and I have written Linux program that can emulate > 250K IP addresses behind a router. > > > > Peter > > > > Peter Higginson > > Newport Networks Ltd, > > http://www.newport-networks.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipp-users-bounces@... [mailto: > sipp-users-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Michael > Hirschbichler > Sent: 10 October 2007 08:50 > To: sipp-users@...; sipp-devel@... > Subject: [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? > > > > Hi all! > > > > Just had a (awkward) discussion with a representative of a commercial > > SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp. > > > > Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured > > cps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for statistics. I'm not > > curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT, but just the > > current "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp. > > > > I think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki, > > > > thanks in advance and BR > > Michael > > > > -- > > Michael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing. > > Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation > > Technische Universitaet Wien > > A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388 > > Tel: +43 1 58801 38846 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipp-users mailing list > > Sipp-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > ------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please > > notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, > > disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Newport Networks Limited is registered in England. Registration number 4067591. > Registered office: 6 St. Andrew Street, London EC4A 3LX > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-devel mailing list > Sipp-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-devel > > -- HP OpenCall Software http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/ ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) - 2007-10-10 08:53 Attachments: Message as HTML ```I planned to do a performance test with the latest trunk version to = finish the regression test campaign I am currently running (hope next = week). I'll let you know the result. =20 Regards, =20 Olivier Boulkroune =20 ________________________________ De : sipp-devel-bounces@... = [mailto:sipp-devel-bounces@...] De la part de Olivier = Jacques Envoy=E9 : mercredi 10 octobre 2007 10:45 =C0 : Peter Higginson Cc : sipp-devel@...; sipp-users@... Objet : Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? =20 There has been reports (late 2006) of 2000 UAC scenarios/s on a single = Linux box. But SIPp has evolved so much (for the better) since then... On 10/10/07, Peter Higginson = wrote: I'm biased, but I usually answer that question in this way: =20 1) We have about 100 testing stations running SIPP (PCs running = Linux), how much would that cost with the commercial product. (Most = commercial products are trying to sell systems for 100K while a Linux = costs me 1K.) 2) Most commercial systems say "you can write whatever tests you = want"; we already have about 5000 test scripts for our product. How many = do they have for testing gateways? 3) For SIP messages, a Linux can do about 1000 messages per second. I = don't often need more, but we do run tests with multiple Linux systems = generating the traffic. =20 The only areas where I find Linux limiting are media generation and = multiple IP addresses. For high rate media tests we get media generation = done by one of our own cards with call information supplied by SIPP (to = get 2G of media per card used) and I have written Linux program that can = emulate 250K IP addresses behind a router. =20 Peter =20 Peter Higginson Newport Networks Ltd, http://www.newport-networks.com/=20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: sipp-users-bounces@... = [mailto:sipp-users-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Michael = Hirschbichler Sent: 10 October 2007 08:50 To: sipp-users@...; sipp-devel@... Subject: [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? =20 Hi all! =20 Just had a (awkward) discussion with a representative of a commercial SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp. =20 Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured cps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for statistics. I'm not curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT, but just the current "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp. =20 I think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki, =20 thanks in advance and BR Michael =20 --=20 Michael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing. Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation Technische Universitaet Wien A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388 Tel: +43 1 58801 38846 =20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/=20 _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users=20 =20 ________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in = error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized = copying, disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly = forbidden. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------- Newport Networks Limited is registered in England. Registration number = 4067591. Registered office: 6 St. Andrew Street, London EC4A 3LX -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.=20 Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________=20 Sipp-devel mailing list Sipp-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-devel --=20 HP OpenCall Software http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/=20 ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Charles P Wright - 2007-10-10 13:03 ```With the simple UAC/UAS scenario I can do 10,000CPS (SIP only, no media) when using a two processor 2.6Gz dual-core processor AMD Opteron. This is with two SIPp instances (one acting as a UAC and another acting as a UAS), which is required because of the single-threaded event driven architecture. When I need to generate more load, I simply run multiple machines with multiple instances in parallel. In general, this scenario is CPU limited, other scenarios that I've run end up being memory limited. Depending on the scenario, I've run up to 12 machines with 36 SIPp instances in parallel. Charles sipp-devel-bounces@... wrote on 10/10/2007 04:45:13 AM: > There has been reports (late 2006) of 2000 UAC scenarios/s on a > single Linux box. But SIPp has evolved so much (for the better) since then... > On 10/10/07, Peter Higginson wrote: > I'm biased, but I usually answer that question in this way: > > 1) We have about 100 testing stations running SIPP (PCs running > Linux), how much would that cost with the commercial product. (Most > commercial products are trying to sell systems for 100K while a > Linux costs me 1K.) > 2) Most commercial systems say "you can write whatever tests you > want"; we already have about 5000 test scripts for our product. How > many do they have for testing gateways? > 3) For SIP messages, a Linux can do about 1000 messages per > second. I don't often need more, but we do run tests with multiple > Linux systems generating the traffic. > > The only areas where I find Linux limiting are media generation and > multiple IP addresses. For high rate media tests we get media > generation done by one of our own cards with call information > supplied by SIPP (to get 2G of media per card used) and I have > written Linux program that can emulate 250K IP addresses behind a router. > > Peter > > Peter Higginson > Newport Networks Ltd, > http://www.newport-networks.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipp-users-bounces@... [mailto:sipp-users- > bounces@...] On Behalf Of Michael Hirschbichler > Sent: 10 October 2007 08:50 > To: sipp-users@...; sipp-devel@... > Subject: [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? > > Hi all! > > Just had a (awkward) discussion with a representative of a commercial > SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp. > > Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured > cps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for statistics. I'm not > curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT, but just the > current "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp. > > I think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki, > > thanks in advance and BR > Michael > > -- > Michael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing. > Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation > Technische Universitaet Wien > A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388 > Tel: +43 1 58801 38846 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-users mailing list > Sipp-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail > in error) please > notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any > unauthorized copying, > disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is > strictly forbidden. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Newport Networks Limited is registered in England. Registration > number 4067591. > Registered office: 6 St. Andrew Street, London EC4A 3LX > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-devel mailing list > Sipp-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-devel > > > > -- > HP OpenCall Software > http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-devel mailing list > Sipp-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-devel ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Charles P Wright - 2007-10-10 15:21 ```Bharath.Mundlapudi@... wrote on 10/10/2007 10:55:35 AM: > >With the simple UAC/UAS scenario I can do 10,000CPS (SIP only, no media) > >when using a two processor 2.6Gz dual-core processor AMD Opteron. > > > Is this 10000 CPS for INVITE scenario? Actually, this would be a MESSAGE scenario not an INVITE scenario, which makes a big difference (roughly 40% the messages). > What is your proxy implemention and running on which OS? This is a back-to-back number, but you can get similar numbers with a proxy in the middle. > Is it based on C implementation or other language? C. > > > This is > >with two SIPp instances (one acting as a UAC and another acting as a UAS), > >which is required because of the single-threaded event driven > >architecture. When I need to generate more load, I simply run multiple > >machines with multiple instances in parallel. In general, this scenario > >is CPU limited, other scenarios that I've run end up being memory limited. > > Depending on the scenario, I've run up to 12 machines with 36 SIPp > >instances in parallel. > > > > > If one wants to run on multiple machines, how would we sync the runs and > consolidate the results? Is there anyway to do this in SIPP? You have to create tooling outside of SIPp to consolidate the results. Charles ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Bharath Mundlapudi - 2007-10-10 15:01 ```>With the simple UAC/UAS scenario I can do 10,000CPS (SIP only, no media) >when using a two processor 2.6Gz dual-core processor AMD Opteron. > Is this 10000 CPS for INVITE scenario? What is your proxy implemention and running on which OS? Is it based on C implementation or other language? > This is >with two SIPp instances (one acting as a UAC and another acting as a UAS), >which is required because of the single-threaded event driven >architecture. When I need to generate more load, I simply run multiple >machines with multiple instances in parallel. In general, this scenario >is CPU limited, other scenarios that I've run end up being memory limited. > Depending on the scenario, I've run up to 12 machines with 36 SIPp >instances in parallel. > > If one wants to run on multiple machines, how would we sync the runs and consolidate the results? Is there anyway to do this in SIPP? -Bharath ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Webpro - 2007-10-10 14:43 ```I have run a peak of somewhere around 5000 signaling only CPS between serv= ers on a locally switched network.. I recall running into Linux UDP buffe= r issues above 5K cps. At the time, I was running RedHat AS4.=0A=0A=0A=0A-= ---- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Michael Hirschbichler =0ATo: sipp-users@...; sipp-devel@...= .net=0ASent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:49:36 AM=0ASubject: [Sipp-users= ] SIPp Performance - High-Score?=0A=0AHi all!=0A=0AJust had a (awkward) dis= cussion with a representative of a commercial=0ASIP-testing - solution abou= t the performance of SIPp.=0A=0ANow I am wondering about Your experiences f= or the maximum measured=0Acps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for = statistics. I'm not=0Acurious about the performance - or the type - of the = SUT, but just the=0Acurrent "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp= .=0A=0AI think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki,=0A=0Athanks in= advance and BR=0AMichael=0A=0A-- =0AMichael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing.=0AIn= stitut fuer Breitbandkommunikation=0ATechnische Universitaet Wien=0AA-1040 = Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388=0ATel: +43 1 58801 38846=0A=0A=0A-------------= ------------------------------------------------------------=0AThis SF.net = email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.=0AStill grepping through log files to fi= nd problems? Stop.=0ANow Search log events and configuration files using A= JAX and a browser.=0ADownload your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.sp= lunk.com/=0A_______________________________________________=0ASipp-users ma= iling list=0ASipp-users@... href="0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.n=" target="_new">0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.n= et/lists/listinfo/sipp-users=0A=0A=0A ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? From: Charles P Wright - 2007-10-10 15:19 ```If you want to obtain maximum performance you need to increase various networking buffers using /proc/sys or sysctl. Charles sipp-users-bounces@... wrote on 10/10/2007 10:43:49 AM: > I have run a peak of somewhere around 5000 signaling only CPS > between servers on a locally switched network.. I recall running > into Linux UDP buffer issues above 5K cps. At the time, I was > running RedHat AS4. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Michael Hirschbichler > To: sipp-users@...; sipp-devel@... > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:49:36 AM > Subject: [Sipp-users] SIPp Performance - High-Score? > > Hi all! > > Just had a (awkward) discussion with a representative of a commercial > SIP-testing - solution about the performance of SIPp. > > Now I am wondering about Your experiences for the maximum measured > cps-rate of a 'usual' INVITE-scenario - just for statistics. I'm not > curious about the performance - or the type - of the SUT, but just the > current "cps - high-score", You ever archived with SIPp. > > I think, this fact would also be useful for the wiki, > > thanks in advance and BR > Michael > > -- > Michael Hirschbichler, Dipl.-Ing. > Institut fuer Breitbandkommunikation > Technische Universitaet Wien > A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstr. 9-11/388 > Tel: +43 1 58801 38846 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-users mailing list > Sipp-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-users mailing list > Sipp-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users ```

 [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support From: Artem Naluzhnyy - 2007-10-05 07:40 Attachments: sipp-freebsd.diff ```Hi, Could you please commit attached patches for FreeBSD support. They fix LIBS_freebsd and INCDIR_freebsd in Makefile and add some '#if defined(__FreeBSD__)'. I have already included the patches into our FreeBSD Ports Collection repository (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/sipp/files/), but it would be better to commit them into the original repository. -- Sincerely, Artem Naluzhnyy net/sipp FreeBSD port maintainer ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support From: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) - 2007-10-05 08:07 ```Hi Artem, Could you please submit a patch following this link = http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=3D104305&atid=3D637566 ? This = helps us tracking contributions.=20 Is this a bug fix ? Thanks a lot for your patch. Regards, Olivier Boulkroune =20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: sipp-devel-bounces@... = [mailto:sipp-devel-bounces@...] De la part de Artem = Naluzhnyy Envoy=E9=A0: vendredi 5 octobre 2007 09:41 =C0=A0: sipp-devel@... Objet=A0: [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support Hi, Could you please commit attached patches for FreeBSD support. They fix LIBS_freebsd and INCDIR_freebsd in Makefile and add some '#if defined(__FreeBSD__)'. I have already included the patches into our FreeBSD Ports Collection repository = (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/sipp/files/), but it would be better to commit them into the original repository. --=20 Sincerely, Artem Naluzhnyy net/sipp FreeBSD port maintainer ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support From: Artem Naluzhnyy - 2007-10-05 08:33 ```2007/10/5, Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) : > Could you please submit a patch following this link http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=104305&atid=637566 ? This helps us tracking contributions. Actually I posted previous version of the patch 8 months ago but have not received any feedback - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1658322&group_id=104305&atid=637566 (I've updated the ticket) > Is this a bug fix ? Depends ;) No bugs in your code but the changes help to build the code on FreeBSD. -- Sincerely, Artem Naluzhnyy ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support From: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) - 2007-10-05 09:02 ```Checked-in (rev 309). Thanks ! Olivier Boulkroune =20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: tutatnhamon@... [mailto:tutatnhamon@...] De la part = de Artem Naluzhnyy Envoy=E9=A0: vendredi 5 octobre 2007 10:33 =C0=A0: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) Cc=A0: sipp-devel@... Objet=A0: Re: [Sipp-devel] FreeBSD support 2007/10/5, Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) = : > Could you please submit a patch following this link = http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=3D104305&atid=3D637566 ? This = helps us tracking contributions. Actually I posted previous version of the patch 8 months ago but have not received any feedback - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=3Ddetail&aid=3D1658322&grou= p_id=3D104305&atid=3D637566 (I've updated the ticket) > Is this a bug fix ? Depends ;) No bugs in your code but the changes help to build the code on FreeBSD. --=20 Sincerely, Artem Naluzhnyy ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] CSV Separator From: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) - 2007-10-03 08:08 ```Hi Charles, I'm surprised because I can load semi-colon separated sipp CSV files in = Excel without problems, but it doesn't work properly if I change the = separator to a comma (using the -stat_delimiter option).=20 What Excel do you use (I use the 2003 one) ? What do you mean by don't = get an import wizard ? Best regards, Olivier Boulkroune PS: Use rather the sipp-devel ML for discussions about sipp source. =20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: Charles P Wright [mailto:cpwright@... Envoy=E9=A0: mardi 2 octobre 2007 20:18 =C0=A0: sipp-users@... Cc=A0: Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) Objet=A0: CSV Separator The default SIPp CSV separator is not in fact a comma, but rather a=20 semi-colon. This means that if you try to load the file directly in = Excel=20 you don't get an import wizard; and the data is unusable. Does anyone=20 have objections to changing the default separator to a comma after the = 3.0=20 release? Charles ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] CSV Separator From: Klaus Darilion - 2007-10-03 08:45 ```Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) schrieb: > Hi Charles, > > I'm surprised because I can load semi-colon separated sipp CSV files in Excel without problems, but it doesn't work properly if I change the separator to a comma (using the -stat_delimiter option). > > What Excel do you use (I use the 2003 one) ? What do you mean by don't get an import wizard ? AFAIK Excel uses Windows country settings to find out if it should use ; or , as csv delimiter. regards klaus ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] CSV Separator From: Charles P Wright - 2007-10-03 13:25 ```Klaus, Simon, and Olivier, I did not know that European versions of Excel require semi-colons instead of commas, whereas the American versions require commas. As either default is sensible, I think it makes sense to leave what is currently there. Simon, I personally am not a fan of tab, because I like to see my delimiters, and think that it is much too dangerous to give white space meaning. Thanks, Charles BTW, Olivier, I originally posted to sipp-users rather than sipp-devel, because I wanted to get user opinion's not just those of developers. "Simon Flannery" wrote on 10/03/2007 08:57:37 AM: > When I was a SIPp newbie I thought using a semi-colon in a CVS was > silly. That was before I was transferred to Europe for work. And now I > understand, and I wish I could retract my initial comments. :) > > I now have no personal preference, but would using a TAB be a better > compromise? > > Simon > > On 10/2/07, Charles P Wright wrote: > > The default SIPp CSV separator is not in fact a comma, but rather a > > semi-colon. This means that if you try to load the file directly in Excel > > you don't get an import wizard; and the data is unusable. Does anyone > > have objections to changing the default separator to a comma after the 3.0 > > release? > > > > Charles > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipp-users mailing list > > Sipp-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > ```

 Re: [Sipp-devel] [Sipp-users] CSV Separator From: Charles P Wright - 2007-10-04 12:52 ```That sounds like a reasonable idea to me, because it won't break backwards compatibility (in effect, an old style input file would just have an extra empty field). The string processing is done in infile.c getField. Charles sipp-users-bounces@... wrote on 10/04/2007 07:38:32 AM: > While on the subject, I do find it annoying that SIPp requires a final > semi-colon at the end of each line. This is only because when > exporting data from Excel into a CSV file, Excel does NOT put a final > semi-colon at the end of each row / line of data. Any objections to me > tracking this down and submitting a patch? > > Simon > > On 10/3/07, Webpro wrote: > > I have been using semicolon since early SIPp. I really don't > think this needs to change. CSV has been a misnomer for some time. > It really should be Data Separator Value. Maybe it means columnar > separator value. I am not sure, but I don't think we need to change > something that is and has been working just fine for some time. > > > > - Joe > > > > On 10/2/07, Charles P Wright wrote: > > > The default SIPp CSV separator is not in fact a comma, but rather a > > > semi-colon. This means that if you try to load the file directly in Excel > > > you don't get an import wizard; and the data is unusable. Does anyone > > > have objections to changing the default separator to a comma after the 3.0 > > > release? > > > > > > Charles > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sipp-users mailing list > > > Sipp-users@... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipp-users mailing list > > Sipp-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipp-users mailing list > > Sipp-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipp-users mailing list > Sipp-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users ```