On 2011-02-27, at 12:39 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On 27 February 2011 11:12, james anderson <james.anderson@...>
>> i have noticed that a long-running sbcl accumulates "unreferenced"
>> dynamic objects.
> [ ... ]
> ...this actually isn't obvious at all. What does (SETF LITERAL-
> LANGUAGE-TAG do?
> Also, (sb-ext:gc) usually only runs the nursery collection. To force a
> complete collection, you need to do (sb-ext:gc :full t).
yes, a full gc reduces the accumulation significantly.
what is the standard approach to altering the frequency/criteria for
can one include the decision logic and a call to (gc :full t) in a
is it better to record the intent and defer the gc call to some other
would the deferred call be with or without gc off/on wrapping?
in general, where does one find discussion of this issue in the