On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Matthew D. Swank <akopa@...> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:05:49 +0300
> "Nikodemus Siivola" <nikodemus@...> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Nikodemus Siivola
>> <nikodemus@...> wrote:
>> > fix it? If it does not, I can provide -- but not test -- a patch
>> > that provides different address space layouts for Win32 and Win64.
>> Something like the attached. (If the one-line change does not work,
>> but this does -- and if someone can confirm it works on Win64 as well,
>> please do tell. Of course I would like to know if this *doesn't* work
>> as well.)
> Both patches seem to work (on win32-- I can't test win64).
Thanks for the information. I've committed the one-line change as 220.127.116.11.
(The larger patch would have meant that SBCL build on Win64 would not work
on Win32 and vice versa.)