I'm currently using SBCL 1.0.13, and it ships with asdf version 1.102
, and the same is true for the development version of SBCL, while
the most recent version is 1.111. Is it by design? I'm asking
because 1.107, which is 10 months old, introduced
system-relative-pathname functionality, which is quite useful.
vicbook:~/src/clbuild victor$ sbcl
This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (require 'asdf)