On 26 Nov 2007, at 22:46, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Pascal Costanza wrote, On 27/11/07 10:03 AM:
>> That's weird, because SBCL 1.0.11 works on my machine...
> Is that a 1.0.11 built under Tiger (10.4)? If sbcl built on PPC Tiger
> runs under Leopard, then perhaps the fix will be easy, just modifying
> whatever declarations are breaking the compilation, with no real
> functional changes.
Yes, my copy of SBCL 1.0.11 was built under Tiger, but now runs fine
I'm willing to check out from CVS and test whatever you tell me to
test, but I don't feel confident enough to try to change any
declaration myself, since I don't know the SBCL internals...
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@..., http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium