Forwading this to the list:
william.newman@... (William Harold Newman) writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:17:07PM +0200, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>> I just committed from my POV the final fix for before 1.0, fixing the
>> build OS X 10.3.
>> While the work was small enough that I would be happy to say "let's
>> stay on schedule", the total number of patches during the freeze has
>> been rather high, so maybe a slightly extended freeze would be in
> Yes, I think I will push back the release a few days; at a guess,
> now+4 = Nov. 28.
> Not only have there been a significant number of fixes in general, a
> significant number of the fixes have been compatibility ping-pong
> between systems with different requirements. When working by testing a
> patch on every system one has access to, committing the patch, and
> waiting to find out whether the patch breaks anyone else's system,
> realistically we probably need to allow multiple days for responses
> even when everyone is very helpful about testing,
-- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious."
Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs."