On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:39:22 +0000
Laurent Sansonetti <pinux@...> wrote:
> Hi Masao,
> On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 18:54, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> > > Please tell what you think about it (especially the tutorial). All the
> > > stuff required by the tutorial should be implemented.
> > Tutorials are really important.
> > Sometimes when we write tutorials for any bindings, we port original
> > tutorials.
> > Of course, it's useful. But if you can, try to make it ruby-oriented
> > tutorial.
> > Almost of all, it must be easier than original tutorial ;).
> Yeah, I tried to make the tutorial as ruby'sh as I could (especially in
> the samples). And I collapsed some short chapters in a single one to
> make reading easier.
> Do not hesitate to tell me if you find something which is not
> ruby-oriented in the tutorial. These kind of things should be
OK, I'll try it after releasing 0.9.0 ;).
> > Anyway, thanks for your great works ;).
> You're welcome, you did *very great* work in the last weeks. Thanks to
> you we are approaching the 1.0.0 release bit by bit ;-)
Yes. We need to prepare 1.0.0. I'll discuss here about it
after releasing 0.9.0.
> I will start binding the libgnomedb library within the next weeks.
> For now I don't have much time behind me, but I would be happy to help
> you completing other bindings. Just assign me a library and I will work
> a bit on it.
> Another thing to not forget is to update copyrights in all files to 2004
> before the release. Painful task... but needed ;-) I can submit a
> patch here if you want.
We've discussed about it.
If my comprehension is not mistake, we need to update the files which
we updated this year only.
So, I'll fix it so. If you can, please apply it to your libraries.
Nikolai, is it correct?
.:% Masao Mutoh<mutoh@...>