Hi Mitxel
I do not have a map with such kind of points. That's why it is not
handled. I can't even tell if these points are points or point of
interest. That's a difference for Garmin.
Oliver
> Hello,
> This is my first message in this users list. I have checked the
> qlandkartegt-users archive but I have not found anything about this:
>
> I have checked in several .img files compiled with cgsmapper that the
> value for all labels of elevation elements (land-contours, elevation
> spots..) is given as feet.
>
> QlandKarteGT handles well the labels for land-contour lines. It converts
> the value of the label depending on the option that you have choose in the
> preferences (Units: meters/Nautic/Imperial).
>
> But QlandKarteGT does not make the same conversion for elevation points
> (elevation spots). It always shows the literal value of the label. Even if
> it is a text or a "not valid value".
>
> So if you choose "meters" for units, QlandKarteGT shows labels of
> land-contour lines as meters, and labels of elevation points as feet.
>
> Is this any reason for this?
>
> I think it will be fine if QlandKarteGT makes the same conversion for
> elevation points (Garmin element types 0x6300 and 0x6200) that it makes for
> Land-contour lines (types 0x20 0x21 and 0x22)
>
> Is it possible?
>
> Salud! and Kind regards
>
> Mitxel
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
> Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for
> developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it
> provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.
> Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
> Qlandkartegt-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users
|