Toby Collett wrote:
>>>Perhaps we need a capabilities request? so we can actively find out what
>>>an interface supports rather than simply detecting failure after the
>>That's an idea, could be a standard configuration request that takes
>>the message subtype and returns ACK or NACK.
>Yeah, basically what I was thinking.
Actually Ive been thinking some more, We should send an array of message
types/subtypes that are supported when we send the subscription
acknowledgement. This would be far simpler, clients that want to ignore
it can, client libs can parse it and store it in the proxy so a simply
GetCaps(TYPE,SUBTYPE) call could be used as a lookup...