On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:09:06AM -0800, Jeremy Handcock wrote:
> > You're aware that these interfaces are unstable, yes?
> I wasn't aware of that, no. In this specific case, there's some code
A pity. People are currently working on proper XML output. I'm hopeful
that these efforts will come to fruition.
> I see. Does it make sense to have description files to recognize the
> presence of timer interrupt mode, even though there is no configuration
> associated with it?
No, it doesn't. The interface that you're using is way too low-level for