Home / Browse / open wsman / Mail / Archive

open wsman

Email Archive: openwsman-discuss (read-only)

2006:	_Jan (1)	_Feb (6)	_Mar (5)	_Apr	_May	_Jun (13)	_Jul (14)	_Aug (6)	_Sep (1)	_Oct (2)	_Nov (1)	_Dec (1)
2007:	_Jan (17)	_Feb (2)	_Mar	_Apr (2)	_May (3)	_Jun (1)	_Jul (16)	_Aug (8)	_Sep (2)	_Oct (18)	_Nov (3)	_Dec (3)
2008:	_Jan (15)	_Feb (5)	_Mar	_Apr	_May	_Jun	_Jul	_Aug	_Sep	_Oct	_Nov	_Dec
2009:	_Jan	_Feb	_Mar	_Apr (2)	_May	_Jun	_Jul (6)	_Aug	_Sep	_Oct	_Nov	_Dec
2010:	_Jan (1)	_Feb	_Mar	_Apr	_May	_Jun	_Jul	_Aug	_Sep	_Oct	_Nov	_Dec
2011:	_Jan	_Feb	_Mar	_Apr (19)	_May (6)	_Jun (15)	_Jul (5)	_Aug (3)	_Sep (1)	_Oct (2)	_Nov (1)	_Dec (4)
2012:	_Jan (2)	_Feb	_Mar	_Apr	_May (3)	_Jun	_Jul	_Aug	_Sep (1)	_Oct	_Nov (2)	_Dec
2013:	_Jan	_Feb (2)	_Mar (13)	_Apr	_May	_Jun	_Jul	_Aug	_Sep	_Oct	_Nov	_Dec


S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7

8	9	10	11	12	13	14

15	16	17	18	19	20	21
	(1)
22	23	24	25	26	27	28

29	30
	(1)

[Openwsman-discuss] queries on openwsmain

From: Luong Nguyen-Duy <Luong.Nguyen-Duy@Su...> - 2007-04-30 20:52

Hi,

I am trying to evaluate openwsman for my project.
I would like to know:

- stability.  Is version 1.0, or 1.0.1, complete implementation of DMTF 
ws-man, and
ws-cim binding specs?  If not, which features are missing?


- foot print.  What is the approximate foot print, at install and runtime?
I assume the size is indepedent of CIMOM.


Thanks,


Luong

Re: [Openwsman-discuss] queries on openwsmain

From: Nashif, Anas <anas.nashif@in...> - 2007-05-01 00:46

Luong,

Roadmap has been posted to the openwsman.org site under:

http://openwsman.org/wiki/OpenwsmanRoadmap

It has a list of all supported features in the 1.0.1 release.

Openwsman is in general very self-contained and has a small footprint,
however it depends on the libxml2 XML parser which increases the
footprint.=20

What are the requirements for your project?

Anas



>-----Original Message-----
>From: openwsman-discuss-bounces@...
[mailto:openwsman-
>discuss-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Luong Nguyen-Duy
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:53 PM
>To: openwsman-discuss@...
>Subject: [Openwsman-discuss] queries on openwsmain
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to evaluate openwsman for my project.
>I would like to know:
>
>- stability.  Is version 1.0, or 1.0.1, complete implementation of DMTF
>ws-man, and
>ws-cim binding specs?  If not, which features are missing?
>
>
>- foot print.  What is the approximate foot print, at install and
runtime?
>I assume the size is indepedent of CIMOM.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Luong
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>_______________________________________________
>Openwsman-discuss mailing list
>Openwsman-discuss@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwsman-discuss

[Openwsman-discuss] Property value length limits

From: Mats Kronbladh <mklist-openwsman@kr...> - 2007-04-16 14:20

Attachments: Message as HTML

Hello all,

I'm investigating some alternatives for providing data to my underlying CIM
server provider. Without having found any documentation about length limits
on buffers for properties used with invoke, I initiated some testing.

When giving a property value (using "-k name=value" with openwsman client)
with a length of 8000 characters, wsmand segfaults. Not really the behavior
I hoped for... :-)

>From what I can find, there are no strict limits on property value lengths
in the protocols involved (WS-Man and CIM/XML), however there could of
course exist several restrictions imposed by the implementations involved.

I have performed my tests using extrinsic method calls but I am considering
using WS-Transfer/Create actions in a final implementation. As the data will
be transferred similarily in the WS-Management requests I doubt that there
should be any difference in terms of acceptable lengths.

Could anyone tell me if I'm correct when assuming that there's no length
limitations in the WS-Management and CIM/XML protocols? Also, any
suggestions on why the openwsman server segfaults and how that could be
avoided would also be highly appreciated...


Best regards,

/mk