2007/4/15, Wouter Verhelst <w@...>:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:13:40PM +0800, Jiancong Xie wrote:
> > 2007/4/14, Wouter Verhelst <w@...>:
> > >
> > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:07:33PM +0800, Jiancong Xie wrote:
> > >> Hi, everyone.
> > >> When I configure the package, I met the error of not finding the
> > >nbd.h.
> > >> But I find the nbd.h in following:
> > >>
> > >> [root@... root]# ls /usr/include/linux/nbd.h
> > >> /usr/include/linux/nbd.h
> > >>
> > >> when i type the ./configure, I met:
> > >> [root@... nbd-2.9.2]# pwd
> > >> /root/xjc/nbd/nbd-2.9.2
> > >>
> > >> [root@... nbd-2.9.2]# ./configure
> > >> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> > >[...]
> > >> checking where to find a working nbd.h... configure: error: Could not
> > >find
> > >> an nbd.h from 2.6 or above.
> > >
> > >That means it finds your nbd.h, but for some reason can't use it. Could
> > >you please put your config.log file online somewhere, and post the
> > I put the config.log in following link:
> > http://www.vce.org.cn/cr/config.log.gz
> > the nbd version is 2.9.2
> > and the kernel version is 2.4.20.(RedHat 9.5)
> Compiling against headers from that kernel version is no longer
> > Is that I should choose the lower version of nbd?
> No. You should fetch the nbd.h from a more recent kernel (at least
> 2.6.something), put it in your nbd source tarball, and try again. It
> will work then. And before you ask: yes, the resulting binary will work
> on your 2.4-based system.
Yes , although the error was fixed, but some dependent error happened (such
as GLIB >= 6.0).Considered the poor package support of RH, I choose the
nbd-2.8.6 and in the kernel version(2.4.20) . When I recompile it ,I works ,
no errors happened.
> Fun will now commence
> -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4