On 3/27/07, jacraig@... <jacraig@...> wrote:
> techtonik writes:
> > Ok. That's a good vision. So, what about hosting? Don't you mind
> > unathorized third-party folks messing with MinGW database? Me
> > personally would not agree to support so insecurely backed up site
> > even considering MinGW doesn't have any distinct enemies around right
> > now.
> I'm sorry, maybe I missed it, but what exactly is the problem?
The problem is that SF hosting is not for heavy database driven sites
and they are not going to make it any more secure. Using brains and SF
account anybody can easily alter your database, inject content, do
other nasty things creating problems unnoticed. I proposed Earnie to
name any DB driven site on SF to prove the concept, but Earnie
refused, so I conclude that Earnie is aware of the fact.