Having MikTeX 2.7 up and running, I Recently installed MikTeX 2.9, as the
README said I could have both running side by side. Well, that wasn't
quite so, as I encountered some mysterious errors with MikTeX 2.7 that I
hadn't seen before. I couldn't verify that they had anything to do with
KikTeX, but to be safe I uninstalled MikTeX 2.9 again, and got an
appropriate 'all done' message.
But now, while sleuthing my errors, I finally got the bewildering message
"etex.exe could not be started because
MikTeX209-pdftex.dll couldn't be found" .
Why (and how) does mikTeX 2.7 look for a MikTeX 2.9 file, with MikTeX 2.9
being "completely and successfully uninstalled" ???
Does anybody have a suggestion where
Hercule Poirot should look further?
Thanks for any help.
ccn.
--
..................................................................
Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack
Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1
Universit"at Bremen Phone : +49 (421) 218-62031
Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869
D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36
Fax: 346 7872
E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org
WWW-page: http://www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack
..................................................................
|