On Thursday 23 September 2004 05:15, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:43:58PM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 September 2004 16:20, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > BTW why downgrade to vendor shipped rpm? Not that it currently
> > > really matters on FC2.
> > It's a product of using some build scripts that restore the
> > previous snapshot state of the distribution. Patched version of
> > mach, actually. Having APT handle the downgrade would be
> > advantageous. I guess I could hack it to detect the conflict and
> > then add a "librpm4.3-" during the downgrade. But, I'd like to
> > avoid that.
> How about telling mach to use this rpm? I think it is quite easy to
> recreate a snapshot, or configure mach to use ATrpms' rpm from the
> very beginning.
It requires a bit of a jury-rig to get things in the right place. The
best enhancement for Mach on this point would be to implement a new
command that manually generates the snapshot. Such as:
$ mach -r fc2 snapshot
I guess I could clean the root and rebuild the whole thing. But, I'm
lazy and impatient.