On Sonntag, 27. Februar 2005 21:37, Jochen Küpper wrote:
> First, thanks for a seemingly great package!
>
> When compiling beameruserguide from current cvs I had to make the
> follwoing change to pgf in order to not get an error for undefine
> \pgfex:
> ,----
>
> | Index: base/pgf.sty
> | ===================================================================
> | RCS file: /cvsroot/latex-beamer/pgf/base/pgf.sty,v
> | retrieving revision 1.1
> | diff -u -u -r1.1 pgf.sty
> | --- base/pgf.sty 23 Jan 2005 23:19:17 -0000 1.1
> | +++ base/pgf.sty 27 Feb 2005 20:09:11 -0000
> | @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
> |
> | \ProcessOptions
> |
> | +\newdimen\pgfex % will be equal to 1ex
> | +\newdimen\pgfem % will be equal to 1em
> | +
> | \RequirePackage{pgfsys,pgfbase,pgfarrows,pgfnodes,pgfshade}
> |
> | \endinput
>
> `----
> Not sure that it is the right one, but it works for me.
Hi!
this is the "right one", but I intend to remove \pgfex and \pgfem in the next
versions (they are there only for compatibilty with a version that was only
in use for a short time). They are not needed, use the proper units instead
(query replace \pgfex by "ex" and \pgfem by "em", that should do the trick).
> Moreover I have to questions:
> - What exactly are the commands that make acroread-5.0.10 on Linux
> fail on certain of the theme-examples?
I'll try to fix this also in the CVS, some time soon. acroread seems to have a
bug in that version when trying to render a shading that interpolates between
exactly two different colors (complaining about a wrong function resource,
which is nonsense - the resource is correct). This problem was introduced
when buidling a workaround for a bug in dvipdfm. Sigh.
The problem only seems to appear with acroread 5.0.10 on linux. xpdf and
Apple's Preview work fine as well as Acrobat Reader 7.x on MacOS X. So, it
really seems an acroread 5.0.10 bug.
As I said, I'll put back a workaround for this in the CVS some time soon.
> - Would it be possible to distribute Makefiles that copy all
> necessary files to a fixed position in a specified TEXMF-tree?
Hmm, certainly... But I usually do the checkout directly at the right position
in the CVS tree. Or is say tar xfz at the right position. I'm not really sure
whether a makefile would make that any simpler. Presumably it would. Perhaps
someone else might come up with such a script?
> - There are several files with the same names in cvs, which one is
> one supposed to use?
I fixed this. Update to get unique files.
Best regards to everyone,
Till
--
Till Tantau <tantau@...>, http://tal.cs.tu-berlin.de/tantau
|