Is this an existing resource that we're extending, or a request for
something new?
I have a stream of consciousness regarding unicodedata that I'd like
to put somewhere other than my head!
Cheers,
James
On 08/03/07, Oti <ohumbel@...> wrote:
> Good idea, nothing against that.
> Oti.
>
> On 3/7/07, Alan Kennedy <jython-dev@...> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > There's a simple proposal I'd like to make, which I believe would be
> > most helpful for promoting jython.
> >
> > How many times have questions popped up on this list like "Can I use
> > XYZ module on jython?". The answers are usually along the lines of
> >
> > - No, that's a cpython module which relies on a C library
> > - No, that's a cpython 2.2+ module which requires (generators|decorators|etc)
> > - Yes, that should work fine: try it
> > - Yes, but it's pure python and slow. It would be really cool if
> > someone could reimplement the module using a java library (e.g.
> > reimplement re using java.util.regex)
> > - Well, it would work if other module (select|ssl|etc) was available,
> > but it's not (currently the case with telnetlib, which relies on
> > select)
> >
> > All we folks here on jython-dev are pretty au-fait with these matters,
> > but to a newbie coming to jython for the first time, they're very
> > off-putting.
> >
> > I think there are a large number of people out there who want to try
> > out jython, go to find recipes, techniques and snippets on the net,
> > and end up finding cpython versions. Which they try with jython and
> > fail. And they've no way to find out why, except to ask questions on
> > jython-users, which many users simply will not do. Or search the
> > archives, but the sourceforge archives aren't the most usable in the
> > world, and they can be pretty slooowwww too.
> >
> > I believe we should trying to make it easy as possible for those
> > people, by providing a per-module "FAQ", which would list the various
> > conditions under which certain modules can/cannot be used on jython,
> > interdependencies, suggested fixes, alternative approaches, maybe in
> > Java (e.g. don't use cpython urllib, use Jakarta HttpClient instead),
> > etc.
> >
> > I think a per-module wiki would do a great job on this; it's an ideal
> > mechanism to capture and reproduce the kind of "expert knowledge"
> > people on this list possess. It would also very likely get a lot of
> > updates from people who want to make a contribution to jython, but who
> > don't want to take on re/writing modules, code, patches, etc. Wikis
> > present the lowest barrier to contribution.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jython-dev mailing list
> > Jython-dev@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> Jython-dev@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>
|