JiBX - XML Data Binding for Java

Hi Rice,

I don't see anything wrong with this, offhand. The nested <structure> 
construct is kind of ugly from the code generation standpoint, but as 
far as I know should work. Can you add a bug report in Jira and supply 
the code to reproduce the problem?

  - Dennis

Rice Yeh wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>     I am mapping the XPDL 1.0 document, in which there is an element 
> DataField with the following xsd
>     
>         <xsd:element name="DataField">
>             <xsd:complexType>
>                 <xsd:sequence>
>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DataType"/>
>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:InitialValue" minOccurs="0"/>
>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Length" minOccurs="0"/>
>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Description" minOccurs="0"/>
>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExtendedAttributes" 
> minOccurs="0"/>
>                 </xsd:sequence>
>                 <xsd:attribute name="Id" type="xsd:NMTOKEN" 
> use="required"/>
>                 <xsd:attribute name="Name" type="xsd:string"/>
>                 <xsd:attribute name="IsArray" default="FALSE">
>                     <xsd:simpleType>
>                         <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
>                             <xsd:enumeration value="TRUE"/>
>                             <xsd:enumeration value="FALSE"/>
>                         </xsd:restriction>
>                     </xsd:simpleType>
>                 </xsd:attribute>
>             </xsd:complexType>
>         </xsd:element>
>         
>         <xsd:element name="DataType">
>             <xsd:complexType>
>                 <xsd:group ref="xpdl:DataTypes"/>
>             </xsd:complexType>
>         </xsd:element>
>         
>         <xsd:group name="DataTypes">
>             <xsd:choice>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:BasicType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DeclaredType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:SchemaType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExternalReference"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:RecordType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:UnionType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:EnumerationType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ArrayType"/>
>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ListType"/>
>             </xsd:choice>
>         </xsd:group>    
>     
>     The following are 2 example elements
>     
>         <DataField Id="Partial_Ship_Status" IsArray="FALSE">
>             <DataType>
>                 <DeclaredType Id="Business_Example_Typ2"/>
>             </DataType>
>             <InitialValue>OK</InitialValue>
>             <Description>possible values are: "OK" and 
> "NOT_OK"</Description>
>         </DataField>
>         <DataField Id="No_Of_Stocked_Items" IsArray="FALSE">
>             <DataType>
>                 <BasicType Type="INTEGER"/>
>             </DataType>
>             <InitialValue>0</InitialValue>
>             <Description>The number of the stocked items of the 
> product that customer ordered</Description>
>         </DataField>
>         
>         
>     Here is my binding
>     
>         <mapping name="DataField" class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField">
>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
> default="elements" />
>             <structure name="DataType">
>                 <structure field="dataType" usage="required"
>                 type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" />
>             </structure>
>             <value name="InitialValue" field="initialValue" 
> usage="optional" />
>             <value name="Length" field="length" usage="optional" />
>             <value name="Description" field="description" 
> usage="optional" />
>             <collection name="ExtendedAttributes" 
> field="extendedAttributes"
>                 usage="optional" 
> item-type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.ExtendedAttribute" />
>             <value name="Id" field="id" usage="required" 
> style="attribute" />
>             <value name="Name" field="name" usage="optional" 
> style="attribute" />
>             <value name="IsArray" field="isArray" usage="optional"
>                 style="attribute" />
>         </mapping>
>         
>         <mapping class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" abstract="true">
>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
> default="elements" />
>         </mapping>
>         
>         <mapping name="DeclaredType" class=" 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DeclaredType"
>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>             <namespace uri="http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0 " 
> default="elements" />
>             <value ident="ref" name="Id" field="id" usage="required"
>                 style="attribute" />
>         </mapping>
>         
>         <mapping name="EnumerationType" 
> class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationType"
>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
> default="elements" />
>             <collection field="enumerationValueList">
>                 <structure map-as=" 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationValue"></structure>
>             </collection>
>         </mapping>    
>         
>         ....    
>
>         
>         
>     , which has the structure (just with field="dataType") nested in 
> another structure (just with  name="DataField").
>     I cannot find similar structure-nested-structure structure on 
> JiBX's help documents, but I cannot find other
>     solution for xsd. I can successly compile the mapping but I have a 
> run time error seen below. The JiBX I use is
>     version 1.0.1.
>     
>         as.util.ParseException: No unmarshaller defined for class at 
> index 17
>         at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:40)
>         at xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer 
> .<init>(PackageTransformer.java:30)
>         at xs.workflow.WorkflowBuilder.getPackage(WorkflowBuilder.java:66)
>         at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformerTest.testCase1(PackageTransformerTest.java:42)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown 
> Source)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect (TestResult.java:106)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java 
> :478)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:344)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
>     Caused by: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: No unmarshaller defined 
> for class at index 17
>         at 
> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.getUnmarshaller(UnmarshallingContext.java:2425)
>         at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataType_access.unmarshal 
> ()
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_2(DataField.java)
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataField_access.unmarshal 
> ()
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_MungeAdapter.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_16()
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.Package.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_0 
> (Package.java)
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingPackage_access.unmarshal()
>     at 
> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(UnmarshallingContext.java 
> :2569)
>     at 
> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument(UnmarshallingContext.java:2729)
>     at 
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:37)
>     ... 18 more
>
>
>     Any solution?
>     
>     
> Regards,
> Rice
>
>

Just as an added note, I tried recreating the problem using:

  <structure name="wrapper">
    <structure field="name" usage="required" type="simple.Name"/>
  </structure>

where simple.Name has a <mapping> with extensions. Works fine for me, so 
I suspect there's something else going on in your case.

  - Dennis

Dennis Sosnoski wrote:

> Hi Rice,
>
> I don't see anything wrong with this, offhand. The nested <structure> 
> construct is kind of ugly from the code generation standpoint, but as 
> far as I know should work. Can you add a bug report in Jira and supply 
> the code to reproduce the problem?
>
>  - Dennis
>
> Rice Yeh wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>     I am mapping the XPDL 1.0 document, in which there is an element 
>> DataField with the following xsd
>>             <xsd:element name="DataField">
>>             <xsd:complexType>
>>                 <xsd:sequence>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DataType"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:InitialValue" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Length" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Description" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExtendedAttributes" 
>> minOccurs="0"/>
>>                 </xsd:sequence>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="Id" type="xsd:NMTOKEN" 
>> use="required"/>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="Name" type="xsd:string"/>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="IsArray" default="FALSE">
>>                     <xsd:simpleType>
>>                         <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
>>                             <xsd:enumeration value="TRUE"/>
>>                             <xsd:enumeration value="FALSE"/>
>>                         </xsd:restriction>
>>                     </xsd:simpleType>
>>                 </xsd:attribute>
>>             </xsd:complexType>
>>         </xsd:element>
>>                 <xsd:element name="DataType">
>>             <xsd:complexType>
>>                 <xsd:group ref="xpdl:DataTypes"/>
>>             </xsd:complexType>
>>         </xsd:element>
>>                 <xsd:group name="DataTypes">
>>             <xsd:choice>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:BasicType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DeclaredType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:SchemaType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExternalReference"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:RecordType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:UnionType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:EnumerationType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ArrayType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ListType"/>
>>             </xsd:choice>
>>         </xsd:group>            The following are 2 example elements
>>             <DataField Id="Partial_Ship_Status" IsArray="FALSE">
>>             <DataType>
>>                 <DeclaredType Id="Business_Example_Typ2"/>
>>             </DataType>
>>             <InitialValue>OK</InitialValue>
>>             <Description>possible values are: "OK" and 
>> "NOT_OK"</Description>
>>         </DataField>
>>         <DataField Id="No_Of_Stocked_Items" IsArray="FALSE">
>>             <DataType>
>>                 <BasicType Type="INTEGER"/>
>>             </DataType>
>>             <InitialValue>0</InitialValue>
>>             <Description>The number of the stocked items of the 
>> product that customer ordered</Description>
>>         </DataField>
>>                     Here is my binding
>>             <mapping name="DataField" 
>> class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
>> default="elements" />
>>             <structure name="DataType">
>>                 <structure field="dataType" usage="required"
>>                 type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" />
>>             </structure>
>>             <value name="InitialValue" field="initialValue" 
>> usage="optional" />
>>             <value name="Length" field="length" usage="optional" />
>>             <value name="Description" field="description" 
>> usage="optional" />
>>             <collection name="ExtendedAttributes" 
>> field="extendedAttributes"
>>                 usage="optional" 
>> item-type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.ExtendedAttribute" />
>>             <value name="Id" field="id" usage="required" 
>> style="attribute" />
>>             <value name="Name" field="name" usage="optional" 
>> style="attribute" />
>>             <value name="IsArray" field="isArray" usage="optional"
>>                 style="attribute" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" 
>> abstract="true">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
>> default="elements" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping name="DeclaredType" class=" 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DeclaredType"
>>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>>             <namespace uri="http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0 " 
>> default="elements" />
>>             <value ident="ref" name="Id" field="id" usage="required"
>>                 style="attribute" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping name="EnumerationType" 
>> class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationType"
>>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0" 
>> default="elements" />
>>             <collection field="enumerationValueList">
>>                 <structure map-as=" 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationValue"></structure>
>>             </collection>
>>         </mapping>                    ....   
>>                     , which has the structure (just with 
>> field="dataType") nested in another structure (just with  
>> name="DataField").
>>     I cannot find similar structure-nested-structure structure on 
>> JiBX's help documents, but I cannot find other
>>     solution for xsd. I can successly compile the mapping but I have 
>> a run time error seen below. The JiBX I use is
>>     version 1.0.1.
>>             as.util.ParseException: No unmarshaller defined for class 
>> at index 17
>>         at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:40) 
>>
>>         at xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer 
>> .<init>(PackageTransformer.java:30)
>>         at 
>> xs.workflow.WorkflowBuilder.getPackage(WorkflowBuilder.java:66)
>>         at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformerTest.testCase1(PackageTransformerTest.java:42) 
>>
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown 
>> Source)
>>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect (TestResult.java:106)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
>>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
>>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
>>         at 
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java 
>> :478)
>>         at 
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:344) 
>>
>>         at 
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196) 
>>
>>     Caused by: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: No unmarshaller 
>> defined for class at index 17
>>         at 
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.getUnmarshaller(UnmarshallingContext.java:2425) 
>>
>>         at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataType_access.unmarshal 
>> ()
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_2(DataField.java) 
>>
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataField_access.unmarshal 
>> ()
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_MungeAdapter.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_16() 
>>
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.Package.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_0 
>> (Package.java)
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingPackage_access.unmarshal() 
>>
>>     at 
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(UnmarshallingContext.java 
>> :2569)
>>     at 
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument(UnmarshallingContext.java:2729) 
>>
>>     at 
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:37) 
>>
>>     ... 18 more
>>
>>
>>     Any solution?
>>         Regards,
>> Rice
>>
>>    
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache 
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>

Yeh, it is a typo making this mistake. Nothing wrong with Jibx. Thank you.

Rice


On 4/30/06, Dennis Sosnoski <dms@...> wrote:
>
> Just as an added note, I tried recreating the problem using:
>
>   <structure name=3D"wrapper">
>     <structure field=3D"name" usage=3D"required" type=3D"simple.Name"/>
>   </structure>
>
> where simple.Name has a <mapping> with extensions. Works fine for me, so
> I suspect there's something else going on in your case.
>
>   - Dennis
>
> Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
>
> > Hi Rice,
> >
> > I don't see anything wrong with this, offhand. The nested <structure>
> > construct is kind of ugly from the code generation standpoint, but as
> > far as I know should work. Can you add a bug report in Jira and supply
> > the code to reproduce the problem?
> >
> >  - Dennis
> >
> > Rice Yeh wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>     I am mapping the XPDL 1.0 document, in which there is an element
> >> DataField with the following xsd
> >>             <xsd:element name=3D"DataField">
> >>             <xsd:complexType>
> >>                 <xsd:sequence>
> >>                     <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:DataType"/>
> >>                     <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:InitialValue"
> minOccurs=3D"0"/>
> >>                     <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:Length" minOccurs=3D"0"/>
> >>                     <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:Description" minOccurs=3D=
"0"/>
> >>                     <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:ExtendedAttributes"
> >> minOccurs=3D"0"/>
> >>                 </xsd:sequence>
> >>                 <xsd:attribute name=3D"Id" type=3D"xsd:NMTOKEN"
> >> use=3D"required"/>
> >>                 <xsd:attribute name=3D"Name" type=3D"xsd:string"/>
> >>                 <xsd:attribute name=3D"IsArray" default=3D"FALSE">
> >>                     <xsd:simpleType>
> >>                         <xsd:restriction base=3D"xsd:NMTOKEN">
> >>                             <xsd:enumeration value=3D"TRUE"/>
> >>                             <xsd:enumeration value=3D"FALSE"/>
> >>                         </xsd:restriction>
> >>                     </xsd:simpleType>
> >>                 </xsd:attribute>
> >>             </xsd:complexType>
> >>         </xsd:element>
> >>                 <xsd:element name=3D"DataType">
> >>             <xsd:complexType>
> >>                 <xsd:group ref=3D"xpdl:DataTypes"/>
> >>             </xsd:complexType>
> >>         </xsd:element>
> >>                 <xsd:group name=3D"DataTypes">
> >>             <xsd:choice>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:BasicType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:DeclaredType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:SchemaType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:ExternalReference"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:RecordType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:UnionType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:EnumerationType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:ArrayType"/>
> >>                 <xsd:element ref=3D"xpdl:ListType"/>
> >>             </xsd:choice>
> >>         </xsd:group>            The following are 2 example elements
> >>             <DataField Id=3D"Partial_Ship_Status" IsArray=3D"FALSE">
> >>             <DataType>
> >>                 <DeclaredType Id=3D"Business_Example_Typ2"/>
> >>             </DataType>
> >>             <InitialValue>OK</InitialValue>
> >>             <Description>possible values are: "OK" and
> >> "NOT_OK"</Description>
> >>         </DataField>
> >>         <DataField Id=3D"No_Of_Stocked_Items" IsArray=3D"FALSE">
> >>             <DataType>
> >>                 <BasicType Type=3D"INTEGER"/>
> >>             </DataType>
> >>             <InitialValue>0</InitialValue>
> >>             <Description>The number of the stocked items of the
> >> product that customer ordered</Description>
> >>         </DataField>
> >>                     Here is my binding
> >>             <mapping name=3D"DataField"
> >> class=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField">
> >>             <namespace uri=3D" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
> >> default=3D"elements" />
> >>             <structure name=3D"DataType">
> >>                 <structure field=3D"dataType" usage=3D"required"
> >>                 type=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" />
> >>             </structure>
> >>             <value name=3D"InitialValue" field=3D"initialValue"
> >> usage=3D"optional" />
> >>             <value name=3D"Length" field=3D"length" usage=3D"optional"=
 />
> >>             <value name=3D"Description" field=3D"description"
> >> usage=3D"optional" />
> >>             <collection name=3D"ExtendedAttributes"
> >> field=3D"extendedAttributes"
> >>                 usage=3D"optional"
> >> item-type=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.ExtendedAttribute" />
> >>             <value name=3D"Id" field=3D"id" usage=3D"required"
> >> style=3D"attribute" />
> >>             <value name=3D"Name" field=3D"name" usage=3D"optional"
> >> style=3D"attribute" />
> >>             <value name=3D"IsArray" field=3D"isArray" usage=3D"optiona=
l"
> >>                 style=3D"attribute" />
> >>         </mapping>
> >>                 <mapping class=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType"
> >> abstract=3D"true">
> >>             <namespace uri=3D" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
> >> default=3D"elements" />
> >>         </mapping>
> >>                 <mapping name=3D"DeclaredType" class=3D"
> >> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DeclaredType"
> >>             extends=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
> >>             <namespace uri=3D"http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0 "
> >> default=3D"elements" />
> >>             <value ident=3D"ref" name=3D"Id" field=3D"id" usage=3D"req=
uired"
> >>                 style=3D"attribute" />
> >>         </mapping>
> >>                 <mapping name=3D"EnumerationType"
> >> class=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationType"
> >>             extends=3D"xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
> >>             <namespace uri=3D" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
> >> default=3D"elements" />
> >>             <collection field=3D"enumerationValueList">
> >>                 <structure map-as=3D"
> >> xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationValue"></structure>
> >>             </collection>
> >>         </mapping>                    ....
> >>                     , which has the structure (just with
> >> field=3D"dataType") nested in another structure (just with
> >> name=3D"DataField").
> >>     I cannot find similar structure-nested-structure structure on
> >> JiBX's help documents, but I cannot find other
> >>     solution for xsd. I can successly compile the mapping but I have
> >> a run time error seen below. The JiBX I use is
> >>     version 1.0.1.
> >>             as.util.ParseException: No unmarshaller defined for class
> >> at index 17
> >>         at
> >> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.jav=
a
> :40)
> >>
> >>         at xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer
> >> .<init>(PackageTransformer.java:30)
> >>         at
> >> xs.workflow.WorkflowBuilder.getPackage(WorkflowBuilder.java:66)
> >>         at
> >> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformerTest.testCase1(
> PackageTransformerTest.java:42)
> >>
> >>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect (TestResult.java:106)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124=
)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> >>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> >>         at
> >> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(
> RemoteTestRunner.java
> >> :478)
> >>         at
> >> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:344)
> >>
> >>         at
> >> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> >>
> >>     Caused by: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: No unmarshaller
> >> defined for class at index 17
> >>         at
> >> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.getUnmarshaller(
> UnmarshallingContext.java:2425)
> >>
> >>         at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl=
10_bindingDataType_access.unmarshal
> >> ()
> >>     at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_wor=
kflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_2
> (DataField.java)
> >>
> >>     at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl=
10_bindingDataField_access.unmarshal
> >> ()
> >>     at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_MungeAdapter.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_jav=
a_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_16
> ()
> >>
> >>     at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.Package.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workf=
low_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_0
> >> (Package.java)
> >>     at
> >>
> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl=
10_bindingPackage_access.unmarshal
> ()
> >>
> >>     at
> >> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(
> UnmarshallingContext.java
> >> :2569)
> >>     at
> >> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument(
> UnmarshallingContext.java:2729)
> >>
> >>     at
> >> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.jav=
a
> :37)
> >>
> >>     ... 18 more
> >>
> >>
> >>     Any solution?
> >>         Regards,
> >> Rice
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> > easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> > Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > jibx-users mailing list
> > jibx-users@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronim=
o
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>

Dennis, thanks for cc'ing me.

I'll update the plugin and prepare the upload bundles to get the new JiBX
release published on Ibiblio this monday.

Regards,
Andreas

> Andreas Brenk was handling the maven2 stuff - can you comment on this,
> Andreas? I'm actually doing a 1.0.2 release today, along with a 1.1 beta
> 2, so it's a good time to get stuff updated.
>
>   - Dennis
>
> Nicolas De Loof wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there some plan to upgrade the maven2 plugin to use Jibx 1.0.1
>> (instead of 1.0-RC1) ?
>> Maybe a simple upgrade of the plugin's POM in
>> http://jibx.sourceforge.net/maven2/ can do the job.
>>
>> Nico.

Hi,

I would like to use abstract mapping to map the inheritance structure of 
the following classes:

class Vehicle {
   private String name;
   private double fuelLoad;
}

class AirVehicle extends Vehicle {
}

class TrackVehicle extends Vehicle {
   private int turnRadius;
}

When using abstract mapping, <structure map-as> expected all mapping in 
the same sequence as the abstract class.
So it would map to the following XML:

<airvehicle>
   <name>A-1</name>
   <fuelload>100</fuelload>
</airvehicle>

<trackvehicle>
   <name>T-1</name>
   <fuelload>200</fuelload>
   <turnradius>20</turnradius>
</trackvehicle>

However, what if I want track vehicle structure to be like this:

<trackvehicle>
   <name>T-1</name>
   <turnradius>20</turnradius>
   <fuelload>200</fuelload>
</trackvehicle>

Is it possible to use abstract mapping for this scenario?

Regards,
Vairoj

No, it's not possible to use an abstract mapping when you want to insert 
elements into the middle of the structure defined by the abstract 
mapping. In the case where your structure is just a sequence of elements 
it would be possible to use two abstract mappings - one for the 
structure preceding where you want to do the addition, once for the 
structure following that point - but that's going to be more trouble 
than it's worth unless you're going to be doing a number of variations 
of additions into this structure.

  - Dennis

Vairoj A. wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to use abstract mapping to map the inheritance structure 
> of the following classes:
>
> class Vehicle {
>   private String name;
>   private double fuelLoad;
> }
>
> class AirVehicle extends Vehicle {
> }
>
> class TrackVehicle extends Vehicle {
>   private int turnRadius;
> }
>
> When using abstract mapping, <structure map-as> expected all mapping 
> in the same sequence as the abstract class.
> So it would map to the following XML:
>
> <airvehicle>
>   <name>A-1</name>
>   <fuelload>100</fuelload>
> </airvehicle>
>
> <trackvehicle>
>   <name>T-1</name>
>   <fuelload>200</fuelload>
>   <turnradius>20</turnradius>
> </trackvehicle>
>
> However, what if I want track vehicle structure to be like this:
>
> <trackvehicle>
>   <name>T-1</name>
>   <turnradius>20</turnradius>
>   <fuelload>200</fuelload>
> </trackvehicle>
>
> Is it possible to use abstract mapping for this scenario?
>
> Regards,
> Vairoj
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding 
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>

I've tried to duplicate this problem, but without success. If you can 
recreate it, please enter a bug in Jira with attached project to show 
the problem. Thanks,

  - Dennis

Vairoj A. wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have an abstract mapping which has double value. If I use 
> field="fileldname" form the binding works ok. But if I changed it to 
> the form set-method="method-name" the following exception is thrown at 
> runtime:
>
> java.lang.VerifyError: (class: com/waveman/campaign/entity/Equipment, 
> method: JiBX_catalog_binding_unmarshal_1_1 signature: 
> (Lorg/jibx/runtime/impl/UnmarshallingContext;)Lcom/waveman/campaign/entity/Equipment;) 
> Attempt to split long or double on the stack
>    at 
> com.waveman.campaign.entity.JiBX_catalog_bindingCommunicationEquipment_access.unmarshal() 
>
>    at 
> com.waveman.campaign.entity.JiBX_catalog_bindingEquipment_access.unmarshal() 
>
>    at 
> com.waveman.campaign.entity.Catalog.JiBX_catalog_binding_unmarshal_1_0(Catalog.java) 
>
>    at 
> com.waveman.campaign.entity.JiBX_catalog_bindingCatalog_access.unmarshal() 
>
>    at 
> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(Unknown 
> Source)
>    at 
> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument(Unknown 
> Source)
>    at 
> com.waveman.campaign.jibx.JibxXmlConverter.initCatalog(JibxXmlConverter.java:154) 
>
>
> This seems to happen to the field which type is double. All other type 
> works ok with set-method.
>
> The following are excerpt from my mapping file:
>
>    <mapping class="com.waveman.campaign.entity.Equipment"
>            abstract="true">
>        <value name="name" set-method="setName" />
>        <value name="range" set-method="setRange" />
>    </mapping>
>
>    <mapping name="communication"
>            class="com.waveman.campaign.entity.CommunicationEquipment"
>            extends="com.waveman.campaign.entity.Equipment">
>        <structure map-as="com.waveman.campaign.entity.Equipment" />
>    </mapping>      <mapping name="detection"
>            class="com.waveman.campaign.entity.DetectionEquipment"
>            extends="com.waveman.campaign.entity.Equipment">
>        <structure map-as="com.waveman.campaign.entity.Equipment" />
>    </mapping>
>
> The value that cause exception is "range". If I change that line to:
> <value name="range" field="range" />
>
> Everything will works just fine.
>
> Please note that this binding definition is input only (binding 
> direction="input") so there is no need to declare get-method.
>
> Does anyone know the cause of the exception?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vairoj
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding 
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>

Hi Phil,

I think you could make this work, though it's going to be pushing into 
dusty corners of the code and you may run into some unpleasant 
surprises. The basic approach would be to use abstract <mapping>s for 
all your classes, then have your <AnyXmlable> unmarshaller access the 
appropriate abstract mapping information at runtime. To do this you need 
to use the <binding force-classes="true"> attribute and then find the 
abstract mapping class for each data class via the 
IBindingFactory.getTypeIndex() method. Once you've got the index you can 
get the marshaller/unmarshaller instance from the context. Note that if 
you do this, your concrete <mapping>s can just add a name while 
referencing the abstract ones for all the content.

  - Dennis

Phil McGee wrote:

> Great work on JiBX.  It is the most flexible XML-Java binding 
> framework I've
> ever seen AND the fastest.  I hope to eliminate lots of homegrown code 
> and run
> three to four times faster.
>
> That said, I have one tricky problem I can't seem to solve.  Consider the
> following hypothetical classes
>
> interface Xmlable {
> }
>
> class Foo implements Xmlable {
>   int fooStuff;
> }
>
> class Bar implements Xmlable {
>   float barStuff;
> }
>
> class FooBar implements Xmlable {
>   Xmlable xmlable;
> }
>
> class XmlableList implements Xmlable {
>   ArrayList xmlables;
> }
>
> and the related XML document below
>
> <XmlableList>
>   <Foo>
>       <fooStuff>42<fooStuff/>
>   </Foo>
>   <Bar>
>       <barStuff>3.14<barStuff/>
>   </Bar>
>   <FooBar>
>       <AnyXmlable javaClass="Foo" >
>           <fooStuff>60<fooStuff/>
>       </AnyXmlable>
>   </FooBar>
>   <FooBar>
>       <AnyXmlable javaClass="Bar" >
>           <barStuff>2.72<barStuff/>
>       </AnyXmlable>
>   </FooBar>
> </XmlableList>
>
> which illustrate my problem. Although each class which is marshalled 
> to/from XML is typically associated with
> a uniquely named XML element, there are a few unfortunate instances of 
> element
> AnyXmlable each of which corresponds to a Java object of the class 
> identified by
> its javaClass attribute.  The content of each AnyXmlable element 
> depends on its
> actual type as determined by the javaClass attribute -- AnyXmlable 
> elements with
> javaClass="Foo" contain fooStuff and AnyXmlable elements with 
> javaClass="Bar"
> contain barStuff.
>
> I can create a custom Unmarshaller for FooBar that creates an instance
> of class Foo when it encounters <AnyXmlable javaClass="Foo" >, and I 
> can retrieve
> the Unmarshaller for class Foo which knows how to deal with the
> fooStuff contained by AnyXmlable.  The problem is that the
> Unmarshaller for class Foo relies on the fact that it is dealing with
> a Foo element.  When it sees that it is an AnyXmlable element it 
> throws an
> exception.  I was hoping that some mechanism akin to IAliasable used 
> for custom
> marshallers could be invoked, but the element names seem to be hard 
> coded into
> the marshallers.
>
> In reality, Foo and Bar correspond to hundreds Java classes and the 
> fooStuff and
> barStuff can be quite complex and often highly recursive content.  We 
> have tens
> of thousands of historical documents containing a very small fraction of
> AnyXmlable type elements which unfortunately we must support.
>
> Can anyone suggest a means of patching over the AnyXmlable elements 
> and tying
> back into the marshallers defined for all the Foo and Bar type classes?
>
> Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
>
> Phil McGee
> XFI Corp
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache 
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>

This sample is included in the JiBX distribution, under 
tutorial/example5 If your code is having problems you can compare your 
binding and classes with the versions given there, which match the figure.

  - Dennis

Vijay Wadgeri wrote:

> Hi,
> I am trying to run the **Figure 5. Flattened binding*
> *example from the Structure Mapping section of 
> http://jibx.sourceforge.net/tutorial/binding-structures.html
>
> However I get the following error:
>
>      [echo] Running JiBX binding compiler
>      [bind] Error: Nonstatic field customerNumber not found in class 
> org.jibx.starter.Customer; on value element at (line 4, col 51, in 
> jibxStarter/binding.xml)
>      [bind] Error: Nonstatic field firstName not found in class 
> org.jibx.starter.Customer; on value element at (line 5, col 48, in 
> jibxStarter/binding.xml)
>      [bind] Error: Nonstatic field lastName not found in class 
> org.jibx.starter.Customer; on value element at (line 6, col 46, in 
> jibxStarter/binding.xml)
>
> The fields have been defined in the Customer.java class.
>
> Does anybody know what could be the reason for this error.
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Vijay
>

Sorry...I figured it out with the abstract=3D"true".

Not sure if I can piggy back of this question though.

Below I have a TxnInfo segment that I do not represent in my object model.
Is there a way I can ignore this element in the marshal/unmarshal?

Because I get a org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: No unmarshaller for element
"TxnInfo" (line 3, col 11) since I have not defined a mapping for it.

Thanks,

-jay


On 4/13/06, Jay Blanton <jaybytez@...> wrote:
>
> If I have portions of my object model that do not exist in the incoming
> XML, how do I bypass placing a name attribute on the mapping definition.
>
> For instance, I have the following XML chunk:
>
> <AppBody>
>     <TxnInfo>
>         <SystemId>WebService</SystemId>
>     </TxnInfo>
>     <Sponsor>
>         <Id>0013</Id>
>     </Sponsor>
>     <Person>
>         <Id>123</Id>
>     </Person>
> </AppBody>
>
> The AppBody is the beginning of my ResponseTO which contains an ErrorInfo
> object (if the xml exists) and a list (custom collection) of FamilyTOs.  =
The
> FamilyTO contains an object called SponsorTO and PersonTO.  So as you can
> see, there is no Family element in the XML...it is just a composite objec=
t
> that holds the SponsorTO and PersonTO.  How do I define my mapping segmen=
t
> below so that I can use the FamilyTO mapping without having to include an
> element name?
>
>     <mapping name=3D"AppBody" class=3D"com.foo.to.ResponseTO">
>         <collection field=3D"families" load-method=3D"get" size-method=3D=
"size"
> add-method=3D"add" item-type=3D" com.foo.to.FamilyTO" usage=3D"optional"/=
>
>         <structure field=3D"errorInfo" usage=3D"optional"/>
>     </mapping>
>     <mapping name=3D"ErrorInfo" class=3D" com.foo.to.ErrorInfoTO">
>         <value name=3D"ErrorType" field=3D"errorType" usage=3D"optional"/=
>
>         <value name=3D"ErrorMsgUser" field=3D"userMessage" usage=3D"optio=
nal"/>
>         <value name=3D"ErrorMsgTechnical" field=3D"technicalMessage"
> usage=3D"optional"/>
>         <value name=3D"ErrorCode" field=3D"errorCode" usage=3D"optional"/=
>
>     </mapping>
>     <mapping class=3D"com.foo.to.FamilyTO">
>         <structure field=3D"sponsor" usage=3D"optional"/>
>         <collection field=3D"patients" load-method=3D"get" size-method=3D=
"size"
> add-method=3D"add" item-type=3D" com.foo.to.PatientTO" usage=3D"optional"=
/>
>         <structure field=3D"sponsor" usage=3D"optional"/>
>     </mapping>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> jay blanton
> jaybytez@...
>



--
jay blanton
jaybytez@...
(c) 916-715-1529

Hi Jay,

To ignore the <TxnInfo> element just use <structure name="TxnInfo"/> at 
the appropriate place in your binding definition. This will skip the 
<TxnInfo> element when unmarshalling, and write an empty one when 
marshalling. If you want to skip writing it on marshalling, use 
usage="optional"

  - Dennis

Jay Blanton wrote:

> Sorry...I figured it out with the abstract="true".
>
> Not sure if I can piggy back of this question though.
>
> Below I have a TxnInfo segment that I do not represent in my object 
> model.  Is there a way I can ignore this element in the 
> marshal/unmarshal?
>
> Because I get a org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: No unmarshaller for 
> element "TxnInfo" (line 3, col 11) since I have not defined a mapping 
> for it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -jay
>
>
> On 4/13/06, *Jay Blanton* <jaybytez@... 
> <mailto:jaybytez@...>> wrote:
>
>     If I have portions of my object model that do not exist in the
>     incoming XML, how do I bypass placing a name attribute on the
>     mapping definition.
>
>     For instance, I have the following XML chunk:
>
>     <AppBody>
>         <TxnInfo>
>             <SystemId>WebService</SystemId>
>         </TxnInfo>
>         <Sponsor>
>             <Id>0013</Id>
>         </Sponsor>
>         <Person>
>             <Id>123</Id>
>         </Person>
>     </AppBody>
>
>     The AppBody is the beginning of my ResponseTO which contains an
>     ErrorInfo object (if the xml exists) and a list (custom
>     collection) of FamilyTOs.  The FamilyTO contains an object called
>     SponsorTO and PersonTO.  So as you can see, there is no Family
>     element in the XML...it is just a composite object that holds the
>     SponsorTO and PersonTO.  How do I define my mapping segment below
>     so that I can use the FamilyTO mapping without having to include
>     an element name?
>
>         <mapping name="AppBody" class="com.foo.to.ResponseTO">
>             <collection field="families" load-method="get"
>     size-method="size" add-method="add" item-type="
>     com.foo.to.FamilyTO" usage="optional"/>
>             <structure field="errorInfo" usage="optional"/>        
>         </mapping>
>         <mapping name="ErrorInfo" class=" com.foo.to.ErrorInfoTO">
>             <value name="ErrorType" field="errorType" usage="optional"/>
>             <value name="ErrorMsgUser" field="userMessage"
>     usage="optional"/>
>             <value name="ErrorMsgTechnical" field="technicalMessage"
>     usage="optional"/>
>             <value name="ErrorCode" field="errorCode" usage="optional"/>
>         </mapping>
>         <mapping class="com.foo.to.FamilyTO">
>             <structure field="sponsor" usage="optional"/>
>             <collection field="patients" load-method="get"
>     size-method="size" add-method="add" item-type="
>     com.foo.to.PatientTO" usage="optional"/>
>             <structure field="sponsor" usage="optional"/>
>         </mapping>
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     -- 
>     jay blanton
>     jaybytez@... <mailto:jaybytez@...>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> jay blanton
> jaybytez@... <mailto:jaybytez@...>
> (c) 916-715-1529

I found out that an exception was happening in my deserialization of one of
my custom types.  I played around with throwing checked exceptions or
runtime exceptions and they both caused JiBX to fail, but I never saw them
in the stack trace.  Does the JiBXException squelch the stack trace and not
pass along Throwable?

Thanks,

-jay

On 4/14/06, Jay Blanton <jaybytez@...> wrote:
>
> I have rebuilt my binding.xml file multiple times and I have validated it
> against the jibx dtd.
>
> But I keep getting the following error:
>
> org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException: Error while unmarshalling (line 1, col
> 631)
>     at com.foo.common.xml.databinding.JibxXmlBinder.unmarshal(
> JibxXmlBinder.java:127)
>     at com.foo.common.xml.databinding.XmlBinderHelper.mapXmlToObject(
> XmlBinderHelper.java:281)
>     at com.foo.bene.ServiceBinderTest.testErrorResults (
> ServiceBinderTest.java:972)
>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
>     at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>     at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
>     at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
>     at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
>     at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
>     at junit.framework.TestCase.run (TestCase.java:118)
>     at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
>     at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
>     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(
> RemoteTestRunner.java :478)
>     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:344)
>     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(
> RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
>
> Caused by: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException : Error while unmarshalling
> (line 1, col 631)
>     at
> com.foo.bene.to.PrimaryCareManagerTO.JiBX_ServiceResponseBinding_unmarsha=
l_2_1
> (PrimaryCareManagerTO.java)
>     at
> com.foo.bene.to.JiBX_ServiceResponseBindingPrimaryCareManagerTO_access.un=
marshal()
>     at org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(Unknow=
n
> Source)
>     at org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument(Unkno=
wn
> Source)
>     at com.foo.common.xml.databinding.JibxXmlBinder.unmarshal (
> JibxXmlBinder.java:124)
>
> Can anyone tell me what this means?
>
> --
> jay blanton
> jaybytez@...
> (c) 916-715-1529
>



--
jay blanton
jaybytez@...
(c) 916-715-1529