--- On Tue, 6/10/08, Cees de Groot <cdegroot@...> wrote:
> From: Cees de Groot <cdegroot@...>
> Subject: Re: [Jdbm-general] extensible serializer
> To: "Bryan Thompson" <bryan@...>
> Cc: "Mark Proctor" <mproctor@...>, jdbm-general@..., cowtowncoder@...
> Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008, 12:34 PM
> If the license issue is sorted, I'm more than happy to
> keep it in. The
> original JDBM interfaces are still there, and I'll just
> move it to
> jdbm.extser or similar.
> Any objections? I mean, upside, no license problems, and
> through code
> inclusion no dependencies issues. Sounds like ok to me...
As long as number of classes is limited and they are on different package, sounds good to me. It should be possible to then also compile "core" jdbm without these parts, but default version can include them?
-+ Tatu +-