> From: Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@...>
> Organization: Paolo Amoroso - Milan, ITALY
> Reply-To: ilisp-devel@...
> Content-Length: 813
>
> On 11 Apr 2001 18:02:43 +0200, Matthias Koeppe
> <mkoeppe@...> wrote:
>
> > I would go for $Id$.
>
> Agreed. Note that some files have old RCS/CVS headers.
Ok. I will remove all the comment headers and information (inluding
all the pointers to the mailing list). The header will look change from
==============================================================================
;;; -*- Mode: Emacs-Lisp -*-
;;; ilisp-cmu.el --
;;; This file is part of ILISP.
;;; Version: 5.10.1
;;;
;;; Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 Chris McConnell
;;; 1993, 1994 Ivan Vasquez
;;; 1994, 1995, 1996 Marco Antoniotti and Rick Busdiecker
;;; 1996-2000 Marco Antoniotti and Rick Campbell
;;;
;;; Other authors' names for which this Copyright notice also holds
;;; may appear later in this file.
;;;
;;; Send mail to 'majordomo@...' to be included in the
;;; ILISP mailing list. 'ilisp@...' is the general ILISP
;;; mailing list were bugs and improvements are discussed.
;;;
;;; ILISP is freely redistributable under the terms found in the file
;;; COPYING.
;;;
;;; ILISP CMU Common Lisp dialect definition
;;;
;;;%%%CMULisp
==============================================================================
to something like
==============================================================================
;;; -*- Mode: Emacs-Lisp -*-
;;; ilisp-cmu.el --
;;; ILISP CMU Common Lisp dialect definition
;;;
;;; This file is part of ILISP.
;;; Please refer to the file COPYING for copyrights and licensing
;;; information.
;;; Please refer to the file ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS for an (incomplete) list
;;; of present and past contributors.
;;;
;;; $Id$
==============================================================================
How does it look?
Note that the $Id$ tag is in the comment and that I removed the
'%%%xxx' comment. I know that Emcas does use them, but they are not
present consistently in the code and I think they clutter up the
visual.
> > Well there already seems to be a tagging scheme (at least there is a
> > tag ILISP-5-10-1), so you should simply tag everything with the
> > ILISP-5-11 tag:
> [...]
> > I wouldn't bump the release number to 6.
>
> Agreed too. Marco: if you still decide on 6 instead of 5.11, don't forget
> to update the version information in the documentation.
Of course. My main concern is that now the CVS revision numbers are
all 1.*. I would like to align them. So maybe afresh start with
revision number 6 woulde make things easier.
It is just a thought.
Cheers
--
Marco Antoniotti ========================================================
NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
719 Broadway 12th Floor fax +1 - 212 - 995 4122
New York, NY 10003, USA http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu
"Hello New York! We'll do what we can!"
Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'.
|