On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Schultz <carsten@...> wrote:
>> At least in my modified version version of 1.49 this is taken care of
>> and this kind of white space is deleted. The code revolves around a
>> function optimize_spec/2. I am not sure if I never contributed the code
>> or of it got lost in the meantime, I suspect the latter. I probably
>> should have documented it better to point out why it is desirable.
> It seems that I never submitted these changes, I do not remember if
> there was any reason for it. Anyway, here is (the relevant part of) a
> diff against (I think) 1.49:
Hi Carsten, I too believe that deleting whitespace from around
<erl></erl> is a perfectly viable solution. I'll take look at your
patch and see what might be incorporated.