CEDET

The error may be a limitation in Emacs, but it is not necessary for
the lexer to get these cases correct since the parser doesn't parse
into function bodies, which is what these macros are for (as far as I
know anyway.)

So sure, it is masking a capacity issue in Emacs, but I don't think it
should affect CEDET's ability much.

Eric

>>> bread <breaddawson@...> seems to think that:
>Since compiling emacs is really a big work, i tired Eric's solution first,
>and found there's no error showing up now.
>
>I'm not sure if this is fixed, or i think it only prevent the error showing
>up?
>

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                       eric@...
   Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com          Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net

So, it's because semantic need to print very very deep nested macros in
boost to cache, while Emas does not let it do this. Since these macros are
mostly written in function bodies, they won't affect CEDET's ability much.
Am i right? (i'm not an English speaker, so i'm kind of confused sometimes,
:) )

And will u put the changes of semantic-lex-spp.el which u wrote in last mail
to the cedet CVS? Or i need to manually edit them myself every time i update
codes to the latest CVS version?

I nearly forgot to thank Toby, who r always very kindhearted to answer my
question. :)

Thank you all very much!

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...:

> The error may be a limitation in Emacs, but it is not necessary for
> the lexer to get these cases correct since the parser doesn't parse
> into function bodies, which is what these macros are for (as far as I
> know anyway.)
>
> So sure, it is masking a capacity issue in Emacs, but I don't think it
> should affect CEDET's ability much.
>
> Eric
>
> >>> bread <breaddawson@...> seems to think that:
> >Since compiling emacs is really a big work, i tired Eric's solution first,
> >and found there's no error showing up now.
> >
> >I'm not sure if this is fixed, or i think it only prevent the error
> showing
> >up?
> >
>



-- 
Zhiqiu Kong (孔直秋)

EDA Labs
Dept. Computer Science & Technology
Tsinghua University
P.R China
100084

Yes, you have got it right. :)

I had submitted that change yesterday, so everyone should be all set
with that now.

Eric

>>> bread <breaddawson@...> seems to think that:
>So, it's because semantic need to print very very deep nested macros in
>boost to cache, while Emas does not let it do this. Since these macros are
>mostly written in function bodies, they won't affect CEDET's ability much.
>Am i right? (i'm not an English speaker, so i'm kind of confused sometimes,
>:) )
>
>And will u put the changes of semantic-lex-spp.el which u wrote in last mail
>to the cedet CVS? Or i need to manually edit them myself every time i update
>codes to the latest CVS version?
>
>I nearly forgot to thank Toby, who r always very kindhearted to answer my
>question. :)
>
>Thank you all very much!
>
>On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Eric M. Ludlam <eric@...:
>
>> The error may be a limitation in Emacs, but it is not necessary for
>> the lexer to get these cases correct since the parser doesn't parse
>> into function bodies, which is what these macros are for (as far as I
>> know anyway.)
>>
>> So sure, it is masking a capacity issue in Emacs, but I don't think it
>> should affect CEDET's ability much.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> >>> bread <breaddawson@...> seems to think that:
>> >Since compiling emacs is really a big work, i tired Eric's solution first,
>> >and found there's no error showing up now.
>> >
>> >I'm not sure if this is fixed, or i think it only prevent the error
>> showing
>> >up?
>> >
>>
>
>
>

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                       eric@...
   Siege: http://www.siege-engine.com          Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net